130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28072552)
1. Vehicle-Controlled, Phase 2 Clinical Trial of a Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert in a Chronic Allergen Challenge Model.
Torkildsen G; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; McLaurin E; Potts SL; Mah FS
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Mar; 33(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 28072552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
Crampton HJ
Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 12946545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prolonged effectiveness of bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
Williams JI; Kennedy KS; Gow JA; Torkildsen GL; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Aug; 27(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21649522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time to onset and duration of action of the antihistamine bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis: a phase III, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge assessment in adults and children.
Abelson MB; Torkildsen GL; Williams JI; Gow JA; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR;
Clin Ther; 2009 Sep; 31(9):1908-21. PubMed ID: 19843481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phase 3 Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety of a Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis.
McLaurin EB; Evans D; Repke CS; Sato MA; Gomes PJ; Reilly E; Blender N; Silva FQ; Vantipalli S; Metzinger JL; Gibson A; Goldstein MH
Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 229():288-300. PubMed ID: 33773984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioequivalence of two formulations of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution: a single-center, randomized, double-masked conjunctival allergen challenge investigation in allergic conjunctivitis.
Torkildsen GL; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ
Clin Ther; 2008 Jul; 30(7):1272-82. PubMed ID: 18691986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Udell IJ
Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the onset and duration of effect of azelastine eye drops (0.05%) versus placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis using an allergen challenge model.
Friedlaender MH; Harris J; LaVallee N; Russell H; Shilstone J
Ophthalmology; 2000 Dec; 107(12):2152-7. PubMed ID: 11097587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Abelson MB; Greiner JV
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of emedastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution with loratadine 10 mg and their combination in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Abelson MB; Kaplan AP
Clin Ther; 2002 Mar; 24(3):445-56. PubMed ID: 11952027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phase III trials examining the efficacy of cetirizine ophthalmic solution 0.24% compared to vehicle for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Meier EJ; Torkildsen GL; Gomes PJ; Jasek MC
Clin Ophthalmol; 2018; 12():2617-2628. PubMed ID: 30587908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution versus fluticasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
Rosenwasser LJ; Mahr T; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Kennedy K
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2008; 29(6):644-53. PubMed ID: 19063816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A placebo-controlled comparison of ketotifen fumarate and nedocromil sodium ophthalmic solutions for the prevention of ocular itching with the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Minno G
Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1988-2005. PubMed ID: 12946546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A multicenter, double-masked, randomized evaluation of olopatadine 0.2% using the conjunctival allergen challenge model in Japanese patients with allergic conjunctivitis].
Ohno S;
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Dec; 116(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 23379201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phase 3 Randomized Double-Masked Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily 0.77% Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model.
McLaurin E; Narvekar A; Gomes P; Adewale A; Torkildsen G
Cornea; 2015 Oct; 34(10):1245-51. PubMed ID: 26266427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter clinical evaluation of bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solutions 1.0% and 1.5% to treat allergic conjunctivitis.
Macejko TT; Bergmann MT; Williams JI; Gow JA; Gomes PJ; McNamara TR; Abelson MB;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jul; 150(1):122-127.e5. PubMed ID: 20488431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
