268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28073354)
1. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses.
Rognoni C; Tarricone R
BMC Urol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 28073354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterisation: cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses.
Rognoni C; Tarricone R
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e012360. PubMed ID: 28096251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic catheters for clean intermittent catheterization: a meta-analysis to determine their capacity in reducing urinary tract infections.
Plata M; Santander J; Zuluaga L; Torres-Sandoval C; Valencia S; Azuero J; Trujillo CG
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):491-499. PubMed ID: 36547679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of hydrophilic catheters on urinary tract infections in people with spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li L; Ye W; Ruan H; Yang B; Zhang S; Li L
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 94(4):782-7. PubMed ID: 23168400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of hydrophilic coated catheters on urethral trauma, microtrauma and adverse events with intermittent catheterization in patients with bladder dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liao X; Liu Y; Liang S; Li K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Jul; 54(7):1461-1470. PubMed ID: 35449382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.
Prieto J; Murphy CL; Moore KN; Fader M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD006008. PubMed ID: 25208303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.
Bermingham SL; Hodgkinson S; Wright S; Hayter E; Spinks J; Pellowe C
BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():e8639. PubMed ID: 23303886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrophilic catheters: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(9):1-31. PubMed ID: 23074500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection.
Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydrophilic catheters for intermittent catheterization and occurrence of urinary tract infections. A retrospective comparative study in patients with spinal cord Injury.
Ali S; Khan OS; Youssef AM; Saba I; Alfedaih D
BMC Urol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):122. PubMed ID: 38867233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the microbiological milieu of patients randomized to either hydrophilic or conventional PVC catheters for clean intermittent catheterization.
Lucas EJ; Baxter C; Singh C; Mohamed AZ; Li B; Zhang J; Jayanthi VR; Koff SA; VanderBrink B; Justice SS
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Jun; 12(3):172.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26951923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. WITHDRAWN: Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.
Prieto J; Murphy CL; Moore KN; Fader M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD006008. PubMed ID: 28796279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized Clinical Trial Using Sterile Single Use and Reused Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization with a Clean Technique in Spina Bifida Cases: Short-Term Urinary Tract Infection Outcomes.
Madero-Morales PA; Robles-Torres JI; Vizcarra-Mata G; Guillén-Lozoya AH; Mendoza-Olazarán S; Garza-González E; Gutiérrez-González A
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):153-158. PubMed ID: 30916625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.
Shamout S; Biardeau X; Corcos J; Campeau L
Spinal Cord; 2017 Jul; 55(7):629-643. PubMed ID: 28117329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(1):1-153. PubMed ID: 30847008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in Brazil? - A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries.
Truzzi JC; Teich V; Pepe C
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 28792195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infections in acute spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
Cardenas DD; Moore KN; Dannels-McClure A; Scelza WM; Graves DE; Brooks M; Busch AK
PM R; 2011 May; 3(5):408-17. PubMed ID: 21570027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current evidence on intermittent catheterization: sterile single-use catheters or clean reused catheters and the incidence of UTI.
Getliffe K; Fader M; Allen C; Pinar K; Moore KN
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 17505249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic-coated intermittent catheters compared with uncoated catheters in Canada: a public payer perspective.
Welk B; Isaranuwatchai W; Krassioukov A; Husted Torp L; Elterman D
J Med Econ; 2018 Jul; 21(7):639-648. PubMed ID: 29458282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of hydrophilic-coated catheters in long-term intermittent catheter users in the UK.
Baker H; Avey B; Overbeck Rethmeier L; Mealing S; Lynge Buchter M; Averbeck MA; Thiruchelvam N
Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Feb; 39(2):319-328. PubMed ID: 36444510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
