270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28073354)
21. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in Brazil? - A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries.
Truzzi JC; Teich V; Pepe C
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 28792195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.
Schumm K; Lam TB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):738-46. PubMed ID: 18951451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention.
Barken KB; Vaabengaard R
BMC Urol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):153. PubMed ID: 36123663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy and safety of urinary catheters with silver alloy coating in patients with spinal cord injury: a multicentric pragmatic randomized controlled trial. The ESCALE trial.
Bonfill X; Rigau D; Esteban-Fuertes M; Barrera-Chacón JM; Jáuregui-Abrisqueta ML; Salvador S; Alemán-Sánchez CM; Borau A; Bea-Muñoz M; Hidalgo B; Andrade MJ; Espinosa JR; Martínez-Zapata MJ;
Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1650-1657. PubMed ID: 28578163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intermittent catheterization with single- or multiple-reuse catheters: clinical study on safety and impact on quality of life.
Newman DK; New PW; Heriseanu R; Petronis S; Håkansson J; Håkansson MÅ; Lee BB
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Aug; 52(8):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 32172456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Complications and patient satisfaction with urethral clean intermittent catheterization in spina bifida patients: comparing coated vs uncoated catheters.
Burki T; Abasher A; Alshahrani A; Al Hams AW; Ibrahim H; Albadawe H; Al Modhen F; Jamalalail Y; Al Shammari A
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):646-650. PubMed ID: 31699601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcomes comparison of hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic catheters for patients with intermittent catheterization: An updated meta-analysis.
Feng D; Cheng L; Bai Y; Yang Y; Han P
Asian J Surg; 2020 May; 43(5):633-635. PubMed ID: 31959575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Re: impact of hydrophilic catheters on urinary tract infections in people with spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Wein AJ
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):371. PubMed ID: 24411860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reuse versus single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: what is safe and preferred? Review of current status.
Håkansson MÅ
Spinal Cord; 2014 Jul; 52(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 24861702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study.
Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intermittent catheterization in the management of post spinal cord injury (SCI) neurogenic bladder using new hydrophilic, with lubrication in close circuit devices--our own preliminary results.
Spinu A; Onose G; Daia C; Panţu C; Anghelescu A; Onose L; Mihăescu A
J Med Life; 2012 Feb; 5(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 22574083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Results of a prospective randomized control trial comparing hydrophilic to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder.
DeFoor W; Reddy P; Reed M; VanderBrink B; Jackson E; Zhang B; Denlinger J; Noh P; Minevich E; Sheldon C
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Aug; 13(4):373.e1-373.e5. PubMed ID: 28713004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management (abridged cochrane review).
Prieto JA; Murphy C; Moore KN; Fader MJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Sep; 34(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 26054029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Long-Term Intermittent Self-Catheterization with Hydrophilic-Coated and Uncoated Catheters in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury in Japan.
Watanabe T; Yamamoto S; Gotoh M; Saitoh T; Yokoyama O; Murata T; Takeda M
Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2017 Sep; 9(3):142-150. PubMed ID: 28868661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Product evaluation of the Luja Micro-hole Zone Technology in clean intermittent self-catheterisation.
Yates A; Weston P
Br J Nurs; 2024 May; 33(9):S10-S15. PubMed ID: 38722003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intermittent urethral catheterisation: the reality of the lubricants and catheters in the clinical practice of a Brazilian service.
Mazzo A; Pecci GL; Fumincelli L; Neves RC; Dos Santos RC; Cassini MF; Tucci S
J Clin Nurs; 2016 Nov; 25(21-22):3382-3390. PubMed ID: 27378618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is routine indwelling catheterisation of the bladder for caesarean section necessary? A systematic review.
Li L; Wen J; Wang L; Li YP; Li Y
BJOG; 2011 Mar; 118(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 21176084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Flow characteristics of urethral catheters of the same caliber vary between manufacturers.
Stewart CA; Yamaguchi E; Teixeira Vaz J; Gaver DP; Ortenberg J
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Aug; 13(4):377.e1-377.e6. PubMed ID: 28865887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hydrophilic catheters versus noncoated catheters for reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections: a randomized controlled trial.
Cardenas DD; Hoffman JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Oct; 90(10):1668-71. PubMed ID: 19801054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Advances in clean intermittent self-catheterisation: impact on trauma and urinary tract infections.
Place J
Br J Nurs; 2023 Oct; 32(Sup18):S5-S7. PubMed ID: 38010969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
