BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28074020)

  • 1. LEAD COMPOSITE VS. NONLEAD PROTECTIVE GARMENTS: WHICH ARE BETTER? A MULTIVENDOR COMPARISON.
    Peters SMB; Zweers D; de Lange F; Mourik JEM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Aug; 175(4):460-465. PubMed ID: 28074020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.
    Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063902. PubMed ID: 23718618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information.
    Lichliter A; Weir V; Heithaus RE; Gipson S; Syed A; West J; Rees C
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 27789076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
    Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?
    Lu H; Boyd C; Dawson J
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 May; 57(5):730-739. PubMed ID: 31005510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-62. PubMed ID: 25771561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments.
    McCaffrey JP; Shen H; Downton B; Mainegra-Hing E
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):530-7. PubMed ID: 17388170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lead equivalence testing using a custom-built testing kit.
    Maddox L; Parin R; Khoo B
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1325-1334. PubMed ID: 36352315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
    Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Is the lead-equivalent suited for rating protection properties of lead-free radiation protective clothing?].
    Eder H; Panzer W; Schöfer H
    Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 15719303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRITY AND LEAD-EQUIVALENCE OF SHIELDED GARMENTS USING TWO-DIMENSIONAL X-RAY IMAGES FROM A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER.
    Kairn T; Maxwell SK; Trapp JV; Crowe SB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 May; 193(3-4):155-164. PubMed ID: 33822208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of non-lead-based protective radiological material in spinal surgery.
    Scuderi GJ; Brusovanik GV; Campbell DR; Henry RP; Kwon B; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2006; 6(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 16934731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization and verification of lead thickness of commercially available lead foil tape for the measurements of lead equivalency of radio-protective shields.
    Lin PP; Aljabal AF; Wargo RR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 21(7):216-220. PubMed ID: 32558227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Composite materials for x-ray protection.
    Yaffe MJ; Mawdsley GE; Lilley M; Servant R; Reh G
    Health Phys; 1991 May; 60(5):661-4. PubMed ID: 2019497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Radiation protection clothing in X-ray diagnostics - comparison of attenuation equivalents in narrow beam and inverse broad-beam geometry].
    Pichler T; Schöpf T; Ennemoser O
    Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 21246474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo simulation of the dose to nuclear medicine staff wearing protective garments.
    Fog LS; Collins P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 19239057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
    Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
    Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emission of fluorescent x-radiation from non-lead based shielding materials of protective clothing: a radiobiological problem?
    Schmid E; Panzer W; Schlattl H; Eder H
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):N129-39. PubMed ID: 22809876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method.
    Wargo RR; Aljabal AF; Lin PP
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):152-156. PubMed ID: 31916401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.