324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28076443)
1. Predicting Reoffending Using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): A 5-Year Follow-Up Study of Male Juvenile Offenders in Hunan Province, China.
Zhou J; Witt K; Cao X; Chen C; Wang X
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169251. PubMed ID: 28076443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of structured professional judgment by probation officers to assess risk for recidivism in adolescent offenders.
Lawing K; Childs KK; Frick PJ; Vincent G
Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):652-663. PubMed ID: 28594209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending: a study in three samples of adolescent offenders.
Lodewijks HP; de Ruiter C; Doreleijers TA
J Interpers Violence; 2010 Mar; 25(3):568-87. PubMed ID: 19584407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Predictive Validity of Three Youth Violence Assessment Instruments: The SAVRY, VRS-YV, and SAPROF-YV.
Koh LL; Day A; Klettke B; Daffern M; Chu CM
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Feb; 66(2-3):168-185. PubMed ID: 33167725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up.
Gammelgård M; Koivisto AM; Eronen M; Kaltiala-Heino R
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 25042997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive validity of the SAVRY, YLS/CMI, and PCL:YV is poor for intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescent offenders.
Shaffer CS; Viljoen JL; Douglas KS
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 35357879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: Comparing the SAVRY, PCL:YV, and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments.
Hilterman EL; Nicholls TL; van Nieuwenhuizen C
Assessment; 2014 Jun; 21(3):324-39. PubMed ID: 23921605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk Assessment in Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV.
Kleeven ATH; de Vries Robbé M; Mulder EA; Popma A
Assessment; 2022 Mar; 29(2):181-197. PubMed ID: 32964720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epidemiology of juvenile violence.
Farrington DP; Loeber R
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2000 Oct; 9(4):733-48. PubMed ID: 11005003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth as a predictor of recidivism in a United Kingdom cohort of adolescent offenders with conduct disorder.
Dolan MC; Rennie CE
Psychol Assess; 2008 Mar; 20(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 18315397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of violence risk in youth for juvenile court: relevant factors for clinical judgment.
Duits N; Doreleijers TA; van den Brink W
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 18538397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the Interactions between Strengths and Risk Factors of Recidivism through the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY).
Ortega-Campos E; García-García J; De la Fuente-Sánchez L; Zaldívar-Basurto F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32209969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Structured psychiatric assessment of risk for violent recidivism in juvenile offenders].
Rieger M; Stadtland C; Freisleder FJ; Nedopil N
Nervenarzt; 2009 Mar; 80(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 18820893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examining the validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) for predicting probation outcomes among adjudicated juvenile offenders.
Childs KK; Ryals J; Frick PJ; Lawing K; Phillippi SW; Deprato DK
Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 23606362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of mental disorders in the male juvenile detention centers of Hunan and Sichuan.
Zhou J; Cai W; Chen C; Wang H; Zhang S; Luo Y; Qiu C; Wang X
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Mar; 37(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 22561490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender differences in risk factors for violence: an examination of the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth.
Penney SR; Lee Z; Moretti MM
Aggress Behav; 2010; 36(6):390-404. PubMed ID: 20623508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in J-SOAP-II and SAVRY Scores Over the Course of Residential, Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Adolescent Sexual Offending.
Viljoen JL; Gray AL; Shaffer C; Latzman NE; Scalora MJ; Ullman D
Sex Abuse; 2017 Jun; 29(4):342-374. PubMed ID: 26199271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A classification of risk factors in serious juvenile offenders and the relation between patterns of risk factors and recidivism.
Mulder E; Brand E; Bullens R; Van Marle H
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2010 Feb; 20(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20104471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) with Indigenous and Caucasian female and male adolescents on probation.
Muir NM; Viljoen JL; Jonnson MR; Cochrane DM; Rogers BJ
Psychol Assess; 2020 Jun; 32(6):594-607. PubMed ID: 32212753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) among a sample of Asian Canadian youth on probation.
Li SMY; Viljoen JL; Christiansen AK; Muir NM
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):485-501. PubMed ID: 33444063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
