These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28077002)

  • 1. Pupil size behavior during online processing of sentences.
    Fernández G; Biondi J; Castro S; Agamenonni O
    J Integr Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 15(4):485-496. PubMed ID: 28077002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Pupillometry to Investigate Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment.
    Lum JAG; Youssef GJ; Clark GM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 60(6):1648-1660. PubMed ID: 28586855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microsaccadic behavior when developing a complex dynamical activity.
    Fernández G; Rotstein NP; Politi LE; Castro L; Agamennoni O
    J Integr Neurosci; 2018; 17(3-4):347-353. PubMed ID: 29081421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spontaneous but not explicit processing of positive sentences impaired in Asperger's syndrome: pupillometric evidence.
    Kuchinke L; Schneider D; Kotz SA; Jacobs AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21195104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual predictability enhances reading performance in patients with schizophrenia.
    Fernández G; Guinjoan S; Sapognikoff M; Orozco D; Agamennoni O
    Psychiatry Res; 2016 Jul; 241():333-9. PubMed ID: 27236087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Language comprehenders retain implied shape and orientation of objects.
    Pecher D; van Dantzig S; Zwaan RA; Zeelenberg R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1108-14. PubMed ID: 19142833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Interacts with Ambiguity During Sentence Comprehension.
    Key-DeLyria SE; Bodner T; Altmann LJP
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Jun; 48(3):665-682. PubMed ID: 30612265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupil size changes during recognition memory.
    Otero SC; Weekes BS; Hutton SB
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1346-53. PubMed ID: 21575007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word position coding in reading is noisy.
    Snell J; Grainger J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):609-615. PubMed ID: 30798470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.
    Wlotko EW; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():20-32. PubMed ID: 25987437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language and motor cortex response to comprehending accidental and intentional action sentences.
    Kana RK; Ammons CJ; Doss CF; Waite ME; Kana B; Herringshaw AJ; Ver Hoef L
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():158-64. PubMed ID: 26300387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid extraction of gist from visual text and its influence on word recognition.
    Asano M; Yokosawa K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(2):127-54. PubMed ID: 21560469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Frequency of Rapid Pupil Dilations as a Measure of Linguistic Processing Difficulty.
    Demberg V; Sayeed A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146194. PubMed ID: 26799065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of look-backs in the processing of written sarcasm.
    Olkoniemi H; Johander E; Kaakinen JK
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 30168095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Language Prediction Is Reflected by Coupling between Frontal Gamma and Posterior Alpha Oscillations.
    Wang L; Hagoort P; Jensen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 30(3):432-447. PubMed ID: 28949823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keeping an eye on the truth? Pupil size changes associated with recognition memory.
    Heaver B; Hutton SB
    Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 21678156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object shape and orientation do not routinely influence performance during language processing.
    Rommers J; Meyer AS; Huettig F
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 24065373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.