These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
918 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28077091)
1. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty - A prospective, randomized comparison. Bhat FA; Changal KH; Raina H; Tramboo NA; Rather HA BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28077091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX). Sciahbasi A; Calabrò P; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Tomassini F; Sardella G; Zavalloni D; Cortese B; Limbruno U; Tebaldi M; Gagnor A; Rubartelli P; Zingarelli A; Valgimigli M Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 24746599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention). Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Coronary Bypass Grafts. Hirzallah H; Amro A; Kusmic D; Curtis Z; Leigh EC; Numan Y; Parsons J; Amro M; Akpanudo S; Sayyed R; Elhamdani M Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jan; 21(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 30885499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice. Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study. Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: A meta-analysis. Shah RM; Patel D; Abbate A; Cowley MJ; Jovin IS Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 88(7):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 27037544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transradial versus transfemoral ancillary approach in complex structural, coronary, and peripheral interventions. Results from the multicenter ancillary registry: A study of the Italian Radial Club. Cortese B; Rigattieri S; Aranzulla TC; Russo F; Latib A; Burzotta F; Agostoni P; Ielasi A; Tarantino F; Sticchi A; Di Palma G; de Benedictis M; Trani C; Boccaletti R; Miccoli R; Valsecchi O; Colombo A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 28463463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches. Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies. Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Arterial access site and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with and without vorapaxar. Déry JP; Mahaffey KW; Tricoci P; White HD; Podder M; Westerhout CM; Moliterno DJ; Harrington RA; Chen E; Strony J; Van de Werf F; Ziada KM; Held C; Aylward PE; Armstrong PW; Rao SV Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 88(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 26698636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study. Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S; Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 5-Fr sheathless transradial cardiac catheterization using conventional catheters and balloon assisted tracking; a new approach to downsizing. Mamas MA; George S; Ratib K; Kwok CS; Elkhazin A; Sandhu K; Stubbs J; Luxford P; Nolan J Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 27707595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy and safety of transradial approach in comparison with transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and ad hoc coronary angioplasty in Thailand. Sansanayudh N; Champasri K; Piamsomboon C; Sanguanwong S; Narksawasdee C; Tengtrakulcharoen P; Laotavorn P J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Nov; 93 Suppl 6():S145-51. PubMed ID: 21280527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography and interventions: 1-year outcomes after initiating the transradial approach in a cardiology training program. Balwanz CR; Javed U; Singh GD; Armstrong EJ; Southard JA; Wong GB; Yeo KK; Low RI; Laird JR; Rogers JH Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 23453098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese. Hibbert B; Simard T; Wilson KR; Hawken S; Wells GA; Ramirez FD; Le May MR; So DY; Glover CA; Froeschl M; Marquis JF; Labinaz M; Dick A; O'Brien ER JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 5(8):819-26. PubMed ID: 22917453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transradial vs. Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With or Without High Bleeding Risk Criteria. Yamamoto K; Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Shiomi H; Watanabe H; Yamaji K; Watanabe H; Kato T; Saito N; Ando K; Kadota K; Furukawa Y; Kimura T; Circ J; 2020 Apr; 84(5):723-732. PubMed ID: 32188831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation Exposure and Vascular Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes: The RAD-Matrix Trial. Sciahbasi A; Frigoli E; Sarandrea A; Rothenbühler M; Calabrò P; Lupi A; Tomassini F; Cortese B; Rigattieri S; Cerrato E; Zavalloni D; Zingarelli A; Calabria P; Rubartelli P; Sardella G; Tebaldi M; Windecker S; Jüni P; Heg D; Valgimigli M J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 May; 69(20):2530-2537. PubMed ID: 28330794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]