These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28077254)
1. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis. Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis. Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability. Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis. Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools. Qiao J; Xu L; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Liu Z; Qian B; Qiu Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():343. PubMed ID: 25305758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters. Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films? De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis. Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature. He JW; Yan ZH; Liu J; Yu ZK; Wang XY; Bai GH; Ye XJ; Zhang X Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):E323-9. PubMed ID: 19531987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis. Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Allam Y; El-Fiky T; Farghally MY; Al-Sabagh S; Siam AE Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 26223745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images. Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of scoliosis Cobb angle by end vertebra tilt angle method. Wang J; Zhang J; Xu R; Chen TG; Zhou KS; Zhang HH J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 13(1):223. PubMed ID: 30180899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured. Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Cobb Angle Measurements on the Plane of Maximum Curvature Using Ultrasound Imaging Method. Trac S; Zheng R; Hill DL; Lou E Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 30587314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Centroid method: an alternative method of determining coronal curvature in scoliosis. A comparative study versus Cobb method in the degenerative spine. Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Lee JM; Park SY Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 23332390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]