152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28078507)
1. Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue based on a computer-aided diagnosis system.
Gao G; Wang C; Zhang X; Hu J; Yang X; Wang H; Zhang J; Wang X
Sci China Life Sci; 2017 Jan; 60(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28078507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DWI of the prostate: Comparison of a faster diagonal acquisition to standard three-scan trace acquisition.
Corcuera-Solano I; Wagner M; Hectors S; Lewis S; Titelbaum N; Stemmer A; Rastinehad A; Tewari A; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1767-1775. PubMed ID: 28301097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Weighted Diffusion Subtraction for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Sato T; Isoda H; Fujimoto K; Furuta A; Fujimoto M; Ito K; Kobayashi T; Nakamoto Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 34085328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic efficacy of b value (2000 s/mm
Ma S; Xu K; Xie H; Wang H; Wang R; Zhang X; Wei J; Wang X
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():125-133. PubMed ID: 30292256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.
Chen T; Li M; Gu Y; Zhang Y; Yang S; Wei C; Wu J; Li X; Zhao W; Shen J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):875-884. PubMed ID: 30230108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of prostate cancer: Comparison of zoomed imaging and conventional technique.
Brendle C; Martirosian P; Schwenzer NF; Kaufmann S; Kruck S; Kramer U; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Schraml C
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):893-900. PubMed ID: 27130048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Triexponential function analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer.
Ueda Y; Takahashi S; Ohno N; Kyotani K; Kawamitu H; Miyati T; Aoyama N; Ueno Y; Kitajima K; Kawakami F; Okuaki T; Tsukamoto R; Yanagita E; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 26119033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI.
Rosenkrantz AB; Lim RP; Haghighi M; Somberg MB; Babb JS; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W612-8. PubMed ID: 24059400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DCE-MRI of the prostate using shutter-speed vs. Tofts model for tumor characterization and assessment of aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Besa C; Wagner M; Jajamovich GH; Haines GK; Lewis S; Tewari A; Rastinehad A; Huang W; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):837-849. PubMed ID: 28092414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer: Peripheral zone versus transition zone.
Lee H; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Byun SS; Lee SE; Hong SK
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199636. PubMed ID: 29933396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transition zone prostate cancer: Logistic regression and machine-learning models of quantitative ADC, shape and texture features are highly accurate for diagnosis.
Wu M; Krishna S; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; McInnes MDF; Schieda N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):940-950. PubMed ID: 30701625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PI-RADS version 2: evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging interpretation between b = 1000 and b = 1500 s mm
Kwon MR; Kim CK; Kim JH
Br J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 90(1079):20170438. PubMed ID: 28830221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fully automatic segmentation on prostate MR images based on cascaded fully convolution network.
Zhu Y; Wei R; Gao G; Ding L; Zhang X; Wang X; Zhang J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Apr; 49(4):1149-1156. PubMed ID: 30350434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effects of different computed high b-values on diffusion weighted imaging scores in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 of prostate cancer in peripheral zone].
Wang W; Shao ZH; Zeng JQ; Wu DL; Wang GL; Wang PJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 97(43):3401-3405. PubMed ID: 29179281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer.
Rudolph MM; Baur ADJ; Cash H; Haas M; Mahjoub S; Hartenstein A; Hamm CA; Beetz NL; Konietschke F; Hamm B; Asbach P; Penzkofer T
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15982. PubMed ID: 32994502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
