80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28078775)
21. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can Teamwork and High-Volume Experience Overcome Challenges of Lymphadenectomy in Morbidly Obese Patients (Body Mass Index of 40 kg/m2 or Greater) with Endometrial Cancer?: A Cohort Study of Robotics and Laparotomy and Review of Literature.
Fornalik H; Zore T; Fornalik N; Foster T; Katschke A; Wright G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Jun; 28(5):959-966. PubMed ID: 29621128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in oncogynecology. Double side docking of daVinci S system increases the success rates of high paraaortic lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer.
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Hambálek J; Maděrka M; Jančeková V; Kolářová V; Langová K; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 31213052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer.
O'Malley DM; Smith B; Fowler JM
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):761-8. PubMed ID: 26385835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.
Rabinovich A
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 27(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 26134173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KPA; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 45():83-93. PubMed ID: 28533155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature.
Possover M; Krause N; Plaul K; Kühne-Heid R; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 9784314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis].
Li XM; Wang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 28355689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
