BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28079249)

  • 1. Fractal analysis of visual search activity for mass detection during mammographic screening.
    Alamudun F; Yoon HJ; Hudson KB; Morin-Ducote G; Hammond T; Tourassi GD
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):832-846. PubMed ID: 28079249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
    Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting diagnostic error in radiology via eye-tracking and image analytics: preliminary investigation in mammography.
    Voisin S; Pinto F; Morin-Ducote G; Hudson KB; Tourassi GD
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101906. PubMed ID: 24089908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated analysis of mammographic densities.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 May; 41(5):909-23. PubMed ID: 8735257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the link between radiologists' gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content.
    Tourassi G; Voisin S; Paquit V; Krupinski E
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(6):1067-75. PubMed ID: 23788627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
    Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of Computer-Assisted Breast Density Estimation: Comparison of Interactive Thresholding, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Methods.
    Kang E; Lee EJ; Jang M; Kim SM; Kim Y; Chun M; Tai JH; Han W; Kim SW; Kim JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 27187523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recurrence quantification analysis of radiologists' scanpaths when interpreting mammograms.
    Gandomkar Z; Tay K; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3052-3062. PubMed ID: 29694675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images.
    Byng JW; Boyd NF; Little L; Lockwood G; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Oct; 5(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 8972250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of perceived similarity between pairs of microcalcification clusters in mammograms.
    Wang J; Jing H; Wernick MN; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051904. PubMed ID: 24784383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.
    Krupinski EA
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Feb; 3(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 8796654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Fractal analysis in the diagnosis of breast tumors].
    Crişan DA; Lesaru M; Dobrescu R; Vasilescu C
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2007; 102(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17410726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Fractal analysis of a breast carcinoma--presentation of a modern morphometric method].
    Sedivy R; Windischberger C
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(14):335-7. PubMed ID: 9816645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
    James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms.
    Tourassi GD; Delong DM; Floyd CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1299-312. PubMed ID: 16481695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided detection in mammography.
    Astley SM; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 15081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic detection of microcalcifications with multi-fractal spectrum.
    Ding Y; Dai H; Zhang H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3049-54. PubMed ID: 25227013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.