BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2807967)

  • 1. [Disorders of bladder emptying following Burch colposuspension].
    Bödeker J; Casanova M; Zingg E
    Helv Chir Acta; 1989 Aug; 56(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 2807967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Burch colposuspension vs. Stamey bladder neck suspension. A comparison of complications with special emphasis on detrusor instability and voiding dysfunction.
    Wang AC
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):529-33. PubMed ID: 8829067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic morphological changes in the anterior vaginal wall before and after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in primary urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Yang JM; Yang SH; Huang WC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Urodynamic results of Burch colposuspension].
    Schürmann R; Ralph G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(9):577-81. PubMed ID: 2378188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voiding difficulties after colposuspension.
    Lose G; Jørgensen L; Mortensen SO; Mølsted-Pedersen L; Kristensen JK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3796917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voiding function after Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence.
    Wall LL; Hewitt JK
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Mar; 41(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 8778413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: a 14-year follow-up study.
    Kjølhede P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):767-72. PubMed ID: 16026403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Does a Combined Fascial Sling - Burch Colposuspension Display Advantages over a Fascial Sling alone for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Females?].
    Pfitzenmaier J; Gilfrich C; Faldum A; Müller M; Hohenfellner M; Thüroff JW
    Aktuelle Urol; 2003 May; 34(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 14566688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Burch colposuspension].
    Almeida M; Colaço J; Santos Pereira H; Vieira A; Gonçalves V; Retto H; Meirinho M
    Acta Med Port; 2004; 17(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15636723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Transobturator tape (Uratape). A new minimally invasive method in the treatment of urinary incontinence in women].
    Delorme E; Droupy S; de Tayrac R; Delmas V
    Prog Urol; 2003 Sep; 13(4):656-9. PubMed ID: 14650298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Long-term outcome of incontinence and prolapse surgery at the Heidelberg University Gynecologic Clinic 1980-1992].
    Maleika-Rabe A; Wallwiener D; Grischke EM; Solomayer E; Bastert G
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1998; 120(3):106-12. PubMed ID: 9556900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial.
    Paraiso MF; Walters MD; Karram MM; Barber MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 104(6):1249-58. PubMed ID: 15572485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors and their effect on the results of Burch colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence.
    Gillon G; Engelstein D; Servadio C
    Isr J Med Sci; 1992 Jun; 28(6):354-6. PubMed ID: 1607271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome of colposuspension in patients with stress urinary incontinence and abnormal cystometry.
    del Campo-Rodríguez M; Batista-Miranda JE; Errando-Smet C; Arañó-Bertrán P
    Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Sep; 52(7):810-4. PubMed ID: 10540777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Burch and lyodura sling procedures for repair of unsuccessful incontinence surgery.
    Enzelsberger H; Helmer H; Schatten C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 88(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 8692511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effects of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a comparative study].
    Tong JL; Zhu L; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(45):3192-4. PubMed ID: 19171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in females.
    Kiilholma P; Mäkinen J; Chancellor MB; Pitkänen Y; Hirvonen T
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Feb; 176(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 8421796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Five years follow up of laparoscopic burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in Thai women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Wisawasukmongchol W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88(9):1182-6. PubMed ID: 16536102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pubo-fascial versus vaginal sling operation for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study.
    Rodrigues P; Hering F; Meler A; Campagnari JC; D'Império M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(7):627-31. PubMed ID: 15382188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension.
    Cayan F; Dilek S; Akbay E; Cayan S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 277(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17653739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.