435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28079780)
1. Subspecialty Influence on Scientific Peer Review for an Obstetrics and Gynecology Journal With a High Impact Factor.
Parikh LI; Benner RS; Riggs TW; Hazen N; Chescheir NC
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 129(2):243-248. PubMed ID: 28079780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics.
Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Odibo AO; Chauhan SP; Smulian JC; Oyelese Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias in the Peer Review Process: Can We Do Better?
Tvina A; Spellecy R; Palatnik A
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 133(6):1081-1083. PubMed ID: 31135720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers.
Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Freed K; Jenkins CB; Paulson EK; Provenzale JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 15547189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Kliewer MA; Freed KS; DeLong DM; Pickhardt PJ; Provenzale JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1731-5. PubMed ID: 15908521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts.
Callaham ML; Baxt WG; Waeckerle JF; Wears RL
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 9676664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pursuit of accredited subspecialties by graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 2000-2012.
Rayburn WF; Gant NF; Gilstrap LC; Elwell EC; Williams SB
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):619-25. PubMed ID: 22914472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
Nielsen MB; Seitz K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating disparities in compliance of nursing pain reassessment for obstetrics and gynecology patients.
Holt EW; Murarka SM; Zhao Z; Baker MV; Omosigho UR; Adam RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 229(3):314.e1-314.e11. PubMed ID: 37330130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A peek behind the curtain: peer review and editorial decision making at Stroke.
Sposato LA; Ovbiagele B; Johnston SC; Fisher M; Saposnik G;
Ann Neurol; 2014 Aug; 76(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 25043350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review practices by medical imaging journals.
Kwee TC; Adams HJA; Kwee RM
Insights Imaging; 2020 Nov; 11(1):125. PubMed ID: 33245469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attributes of successfully matched versus unmatched obstetrics and gynecology fellowship applicants.
Iqbal IJ; Sareen P; Shoup B; Muffly T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 210(6):567.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24412118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicaid coverage and access to obstetrics and gynecology subspecialists: findings from a national mystery caller study in the United States.
Corbisiero MF; Tolbert B; Sanches M; Shelden N; Hachicha Y; Dao H; Thillot B; Adkins K; Muffly TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 228(6):722.e1-722.e9. PubMed ID: 36907536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Race and Ethnicity Reporting and Representation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinical Trials and Publications From 2007-2020.
Steinberg JR; Turner BE; DiTosto JD; Weeks BT; Young AMP; Lu CF; Wolgemuth T; Holder K; Laasiri N; Squires N; Zhang N; Richardson MT; Magnani CJ; Anderson JN; Roque DR; Yee LM
JAMA Surg; 2023 Feb; 158(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36542396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.
O'Connor EE; Cousar M; Lentini JA; Castillo M; Halm K; Zeffiro TA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27856433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fellow Perceptions of Residency Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Urban RR; Ramzan AA; Doo DW; Galan HL; Harper L; Omurtag K; Muffly TM; Sheeder J; Guntupalli SR
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 30093331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
