These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28080114)

  • 1. Oculomotor and linguistic processing effects in reading dynamic horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Godwin HJ; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP; Walker R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):518-536. PubMed ID: 28080114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading with peripheral vision: a comparison of reading dynamic scrolling and static text with a simulated central scotoma.
    Harvey H; Walker R
    Vision Res; 2014 May; 98():54-60. PubMed ID: 24680772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
    White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading.
    Ma G; Li X; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1409-19. PubMed ID: 26168144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased Word Spacing Improves Performance for Reading Scrolling Text with Central Vision Loss.
    Harvey H; Anderson SJ; Walker R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Aug; 96(8):609-616. PubMed ID: 31318800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reading comprehension and its relationship with working memory capacity when reading horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Walker R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1887-1897. PubMed ID: 28766371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading.
    Snell J; van Leipsig S; Grainger J; Meeter M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):969-984. PubMed ID: 30080066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.
    Schotter ER; Fennell AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31512087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause.
    Eskenazi MA; Folk JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1211-1216. PubMed ID: 27873185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of reading, in people with simulated and actual central vision loss, with static text, horizontally scrolling text, and rapid serial visual presentation.
    Akthar F; Harvey H; Subramanian A; Liversedge S; Walker R
    J Vis; 2021 Nov; 21(12):5. PubMed ID: 34751737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading sentences of uniform word length: Evidence for the adaptation of the preferred saccade length during reading.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1895-1911. PubMed ID: 28406688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.
    Choi W; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1032-46. PubMed ID: 23106372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
    Dirix N; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 28116701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for a reduction of the rightward extent of the perceptual span when reading dynamic horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Liversedge SP; Walker R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jul; 45(7):951-965. PubMed ID: 30998066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading.
    Veldre A; Drieghe D; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1612-1628. PubMed ID: 28414501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.