These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28080115)

  • 1. Reaching into response selection: Stimulus and response similarity influence central operations.
    Wifall T; Buss AT; Farmer TA; Spencer JP; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):555-568. PubMed ID: 28080115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection.
    Dassonville P; Lewis SM; Foster HE; Ashe J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Jan; 7(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 9838139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manipulating response set in a choice reaction task: evidence for anatomical coding in response selection.
    Adam JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 17923098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trial-by-trial modulation of express visuomotor responses induced by symbolic or barely detectable cues.
    Contemori S; Loeb GE; Corneil BD; Wallis G; Carroll TJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Nov; 126(5):1507-1523. PubMed ID: 34550012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation.
    Muto H; Matsushita S; Morikawa K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):337-355. PubMed ID: 28795837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of perceptual-motor variability on the perception of action boundaries for reaching.
    Lin LPY; McLatchie NM; Linkenauger SA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):474-488. PubMed ID: 32191110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in perception-action tuning over long time scales: How children and adults perceive and act on dynamic affordances when crossing roads.
    O'Neal EE; Jiang Y; Franzen LJ; Rahimian P; Yon JP; Kearney JK; Plumert JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 28425731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Freely-selected and forced-choice responses bind with relevant object-occupied locations in visuospatial tasks.
    Kajaste B; Buckolz E
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Dec; 73(4):242-253. PubMed ID: 31343190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.
    Saccone EJ; Churches O; Nicholls ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1643-53. PubMed ID: 27668425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks.
    Lee S; Miles JD; Vu KP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 26169949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural evidence for representation-specific response selection.
    Schumacher EH; Elston PA; D'Esposito M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1111-21. PubMed ID: 14709230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atypical biological kinematics are represented during observational practice.
    Foster NC; Bennett SJ; Causer J; Bird G; Andrew M; Hayes SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 29809051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.
    Matheson HE; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):441-457. PubMed ID: 30816789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moving higher and higher: imitators' movements are sensitive to observed trajectories regardless of action rationality.
    Forbes PAG; Hamilton AFC
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2741-2753. PubMed ID: 28623389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortions of visual time induced by motor adaptation.
    Anobile G; Domenici N; Togoli I; Burr D; Arrighi R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jul; 149(7):1333-1343. PubMed ID: 31789572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abstract feature codes: The building blocks of the implicit learning system.
    Eberhardt K; Esser S; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1275-1290. PubMed ID: 28287760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relation of repetition effect and response programming in a speeded choice task.
    Ito M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):503-14. PubMed ID: 10483644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the shared spatial representation of magnitude of auditory and visual intensity.
    Fairhurst MT; Deroy O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):629-637. PubMed ID: 28240932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of visual cue and response assignment on spatial stimulus coding in stimulus-response compatibility.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 21939367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.