These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28080115)

  • 21. Does oculomotor readiness mediate exogenous capture of visual attention?
    MacLean GH; Klein RM; Hilchey MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1260-70. PubMed ID: 26076176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual inference of arm movement is constrained by motor representations.
    Saunier G; Paillard AC; Vargas CD; Pozzo T
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 290():197-200. PubMed ID: 25975175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pupillometric investigation into the speed-accuracy trade-off in a visuo-motor aiming task.
    Naber M; Murphy P
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13499. PubMed ID: 31736089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cortical representations of confidence in a visual perceptual decision.
    Zizlsperger L; Sauvigny T; Händel B; Haarmeier T
    Nat Commun; 2014 Jun; 5():3940. PubMed ID: 24899466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Motor plans persist to influence subsequent actions with four or more response alternatives.
    Tretyak V; Yarrow K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():9-17. PubMed ID: 24657597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Motor decisions are not black and white: selecting actions in the "gray zone".
    Comalli DM; Persand D; Adolph KE
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1793-1807. PubMed ID: 28293691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Different effects of spatial separation in action and perception.
    Schäfer S; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):845-852. PubMed ID: 33501593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Higher order affordances for reaching: Perception and performance.
    Wagman JB; Cialdella VT; Stoffregen TA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1200-1211. PubMed ID: 29874958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Decision theory, motor planning, and visual memory: deciding where to reach when memory errors are costly.
    Lerch RA; Sims CR
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1589-97. PubMed ID: 26821320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distinct mechanisms for planning keypress and reaching responses: a developmental study.
    Adam JJ; Parthoens S; Pratt J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 16650495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Separating the effects of stimulus-gravity compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on visuomotor synchronization.
    Zhou L; Shangguan M; Xing L; Yu H; Wang H; Hove MJ; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):405-415. PubMed ID: 32223292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Common neural mechanisms for response selection and perceptual processing.
    Jiang Y; Kanwisher N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1095-110. PubMed ID: 14709229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reducing the motor response in haptic parallel matching eliminates the typically observed gender difference.
    van Mier HI
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 26378006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms.
    Jiang Y; Kanwisher N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1080-94. PubMed ID: 14709228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of dimension relevance in features' access to response-selection mechanisms.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1873-1885. PubMed ID: 27505222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Much ado about nothing: Capturing attention toward locations without new perceptual events.
    Hilchey MD; Taylor JE; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1923-1927. PubMed ID: 27854455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Regularity of approaching visual stimuli influences spatial expectations for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.
    Kimura T; Katayama J
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 28271219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Specific abnormalities in serotonin release in the prefrontal cortex of isolation-reared rats measured during behavioural performance of a task assessing visuospatial attention and impulsivity.
    Dalley JW; Theobald DE; Pereira EA; Li PM; Robbins TW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Nov; 164(3):329-40. PubMed ID: 12424557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of spatial information on responses of tonically active neurons in the monkey striatum.
    Ravel S; Sardo P; Legallet E; Apicella P
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 95(5):2975-86. PubMed ID: 16467424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.