These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28080125)

  • 1. Valence in context: Asymmetric reactions to realized gains and losses.
    Sussman AB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Mar; 146(3):376-394. PubMed ID: 28080125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing gains and losses.
    McGraw AP; Larsen JT; Kahneman D; Schkade D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1438-45. PubMed ID: 20739673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context-dependent sensitivity to losses: Range and skew manipulations.
    Walasek L; Stewart N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jun; 45(6):957-968. PubMed ID: 30359053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missed losses loom larger than missed gains: Electrodermal reactivity to decision choices and outcomes in a gambling task.
    Wu Y; Van Dijk E; Aitken M; Clark L
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 26667365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Losing my loss aversion: The effects of current and past environment on the relative sensitivity to losses and gains.
    Rakow T; Cheung NY; Restelli C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1333-1340. PubMed ID: 32720085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual valence modulates the neural dynamics of risk processing.
    Zheng Y; Li Q; Wang K; Wu H; Liu X
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jul; 52(7):895-904. PubMed ID: 25664392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Academic decision making and prospect theory.
    Mowrer RR; Davidson WB
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):289-300. PubMed ID: 22049669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?
    Weller JA; Levin IP; Bechara A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Feb; 32(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19484643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Risk-taking in adolescence: A neuroeconomics approach].
    Barbalat G; Domenech P; Vernet M; Fourneret P
    Encephale; 2010 Apr; 36(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 20434632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experience theory, or How desserts are like losses.
    Martin JM; Reimann M; Norton MI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Nov; 145(11):1460-1472. PubMed ID: 27684646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Positive and Negative Feedback on Risk-Taking across Different Contexts.
    Losecaat Vermeer AB; Sanfey AG
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139010. PubMed ID: 26407298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural mechanisms underlying context-dependent shifts in risk preferences.
    Losecaat Vermeer AB; Boksem MAS; Sanfey AG
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():355-363. PubMed ID: 25281799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond gains and losses: the effect of need on risky choice in framed decisions.
    Mishra S; Fiddick L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jun; 102(6):1136-47. PubMed ID: 22486678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of memory in distinguishing risky decisions from experience and description.
    Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 27602887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Losses as modulators of attention: review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains.
    Yechiam E; Hochman G
    Psychol Bull; 2013 Mar; 139(2):497-518. PubMed ID: 22823738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetric valuation of gains and losses in effort-based decision making.
    O'Brien MK; Ahmed AA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223268. PubMed ID: 31613891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Approach-avoidance processes contribute to dissociable impacts of risk and loss on choice.
    Wright ND; Symmonds M; Hodgson K; Fitzgerald TH; Crawford B; Dolan RJ
    J Neurosci; 2012 May; 32(20):7009-20. PubMed ID: 22593069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hedonic impacts of gains versus losses of time: are we loss averse?
    Mukherjee S; Srinivasan N
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Aug; 35(5):1049-1055. PubMed ID: 33787437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mindful judgment and decision making.
    Weber EU; Johnson EJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():53-85. PubMed ID: 18798706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.