These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28080152)

  • 1. Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.
    Correa JC; Camargo JE
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2017 Jan; 20(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28080152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterizing and modeling an electoral campaign in the context of Twitter: 2011 Spanish Presidential election as a case study.
    Borondo J; Morales AJ; Losada JC; Benito RM
    Chaos; 2012 Jun; 22(2):023138. PubMed ID: 22757545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative framework to analyze convergence on Twitter electoral conversations.
    Cárdenas-Sánchez D; Sampayo AM; Rodríguez-Prieto M; Feged-Rivadeneira A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19062. PubMed ID: 36352010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social media analysis during political turbulence.
    Antonakaki D; Spiliotopoulos D; V Samaras C; Pratikakis P; Ioannidis S; Fragopoulou P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186836. PubMed ID: 29088263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
    Brady WJ; Wills JA; Burkart D; Jost JT; Van Bavel JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1802-1813. PubMed ID: 30589291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter.
    Gaisbauer F; Pournaki A; Banisch S; Olbrich E
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0249241. PubMed ID: 33765104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.
    Darius P
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):151. PubMed ID: 36246430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The limited reach of fake news on Twitter during 2019 European elections.
    Cinelli M; Cresci S; Galeazzi A; Quattrociocchi W; Tesconi M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234689. PubMed ID: 32555659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colombian political leaders on Twitter during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Haman M; Školník M; Čopík J
    Lat Am Policy; 2022 May; 13(1):104-121. PubMed ID: 35601252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Tweets and YouTube comments have in common? Sentiment and graph analysis on data related to US elections 2020.
    Shevtsov A; Oikonomidou M; Antonakaki D; Pratikakis P; Ioannidis S
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0270542. PubMed ID: 36719868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Who supports Bernie? Analyzing identity and ideological variation on Twitter during the 2020 democratic primaries.
    Shuster SM; Campos-Castillo C; Madani N; Joseph K
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0294735. PubMed ID: 38603640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians' twitter communication.
    Lee EJ; Shin SY
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2012 Oct; 15(10):515-20. PubMed ID: 22970827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior.
    Eady G; Paskhalis T; Zilinsky J; Bonneau R; Nagler J; Tucker JA
    Nat Commun; 2023 Jan; 14(1):62. PubMed ID: 36624094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.
    Flamino J; Galeazzi A; Feldman S; Macy MW; Cross B; Zhou Z; Serafino M; Bovet A; Makse HA; Szymanski BK
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 7(6):904-916. PubMed ID: 36914806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How (Not) to Talk on Twitter: Effects of Politicians' Tweets on Perceptions of the Twitter Environment.
    Lyons BA; Veenstra AS
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2016 Jan; 19(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26779660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whose Tweets on COVID-19 Gain the Most Attention: Celebrities, Political, or Scientific Authorities?
    Kamiński M; Szymańska C; Nowak JK
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2021 Feb; 24(2):123-128. PubMed ID: 32986469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From an election to an insurrection: Investigating differential engagement and sentiment in the #defundthepolice and #defendthepolice network on Twitter.
    Wirth B; Evans M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0289041. PubMed ID: 38512941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reach of Messages in a Dental Twitter Network: Cohort Study Examining User Popularity, Communication Pattern, and Network Structure.
    El Tantawi M; Al-Ansari A; AlSubaie A; Fathy A; Aly NM; Mohamed AS
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Sep; 20(9):e10781. PubMed ID: 30213781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017.
    Bail CA; Guay B; Maloney E; Combs A; Hillygus DS; Merhout F; Freelon D; Volfovsky A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(1):243-250. PubMed ID: 31767743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?
    Barberá P; Jost JT; Nagler J; Tucker JA; Bonneau R
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1531-42. PubMed ID: 26297377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.