These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28080208)

  • 1. A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.
    Whelan AI; Lema MA
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28080208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security.
    Georges F; Ray H
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28075688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.
    Smyth SJ
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 27858499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.
    Ellens KW; Levac D; Pearson C; Savoie A; Strand N; Louter J; Tibelius C
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):165-168. PubMed ID: 31321700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.
    Sprink T; Eriksson D; Schiemann J; Hartung F
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1493-506. PubMed ID: 27142995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation?
    Jorasch P
    Plant Cell Rep; 2020 Jan; 39(1):163-167. PubMed ID: 31754780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 27960622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separate product from process: framing the debate that surrounds the potential uptake of new breeding technologies.
    Parry G; Jose S
    Physiol Plant; 2018 Dec; 164(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29220093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.
    Ishii T; Araki M
    Plant Cell Rep; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1507-18. PubMed ID: 27038939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current and future editing reagent delivery systems for plant genome editing.
    Ran Y; Liang Z; Gao C
    Sci China Life Sci; 2017 May; 60(5):490-505. PubMed ID: 28527114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crop Gene-Editing: Should We Bypass or Apply Existing GMO Policy?
    Ishii T
    Trends Plant Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(11):947-950. PubMed ID: 30241735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gene-editing surges as US rethinks regulations.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):158-9. PubMed ID: 27075074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The EU Court of Justice extends the GMO Directive to gene-edited organisms.
    Ruffell D
    FEBS Lett; 2018 Nov; 592(22):3653-3657. PubMed ID: 30426476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Scope and Definitions.
    Eriksson D; Custers R; Edvardsson Björnberg K; Hansson SO; Purnhagen K; Qaim M; Romeis J; Schiemann J; Schleissing S; Tosun J; Visser RGF
    Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):231-234. PubMed ID: 32059122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion.
    Lassoued R; Macall DM; Hesseln H; Phillips PWB; Smyth SJ
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Apr; 28(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 30830581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world.
    Entine J; Felipe MSS; Groenewald JH; Kershen DL; Lema M; McHughen A; Nepomuceno AL; Ohsawa R; Ordonio RL; Parrott WA; Quemada H; Ramage C; Slamet-Loedin I; Smyth SJ; Wray-Cahen D
    Transgenic Res; 2021 Aug; 30(4):551-584. PubMed ID: 33970411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives on the Application of Genome-Editing Technologies in Crop Breeding.
    Hua K; Zhang J; Botella JR; Ma C; Kong F; Liu B; Zhu JK
    Mol Plant; 2019 Aug; 12(8):1047-1059. PubMed ID: 31260812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.
    Lema MA
    Transgenic Res; 2019 Aug; 28(Suppl 2):147-150. PubMed ID: 31321697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding.
    Biswas S; Zhang D; Shi J
    Plant Cell Rep; 2021 Jun; 40(6):979-998. PubMed ID: 33977326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach.
    Gupta S; Kumar A; Patel R; Kumar V
    Mol Biol Rep; 2021 May; 48(5):4851-4863. PubMed ID: 34114124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.