291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28081172)
1. Influence of Corneal Opacity on Intraocular Pressure Assessment in Patients with Lysosomal Storage Diseases.
Wasielica-Poslednik J; Politino G; Schmidtmann I; Lorenz K; Bell K; Pfeiffer N; Pitz S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0168698. PubMed ID: 28081172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Rebound Tonometry, Perkins Applanation Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyser in Mucopolysaccharidosis Patients.
Wasielica-Poslednik J; Butsch C; Lampe C; Elflein H; Lamparter J; Weyer V; Pitz S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133586. PubMed ID: 26317991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results.
Abd Elaziz MS; Elsobky HM; Zaky AG; Hassan EAM; KhalafAllah MT
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):172. PubMed ID: 31391006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals.
Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC
Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry.
Güngör SG; Akman A; Yazici AC
J Glaucoma; 2015 Aug; 24(6):438-41. PubMed ID: 24145288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.
Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
J Glaucoma; 2006 Oct; 15(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 16988597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.
Zimmermann M; Pitz S; Schmidtmann I; Pfeiffer N; Wasielica-Poslednik J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169438. PubMed ID: 28068365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-Contact and Contact Tonometry in Corneal Edema.
Gür Güngör S; Akman A; Küçüködük A; Asena L; Şimşek C; Yazici AC
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jan; 93(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 26583789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of corneal biomechanics at moderate to high refractive errors.
İnceoğlu N; Emre S; Ulusoy MO
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 28540493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
