These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28081172)

  • 41. Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure and their associated factors in the geriatric population, a population-based study.
    Shokrollahzadeh F; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Jafarzadehpour E; Khabazkhoob M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 42(7):2085-2092. PubMed ID: 34981293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features.
    Zare M; Feizi S; Azimzadeh A; Esfandiari H
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jun; 37(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22577762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvre on Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.
    Palamar M; Dag MY; Yagci A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 26390907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Rasko A; Morad Y; Harstein M; Avni I; Zadok D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):715-9. PubMed ID: 19304094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with nanophthalmos.
    Altan C; Kara N; Baz O; Satana B; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 22399691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison between different tonometers following intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation.
    Elfwwal MM; Elbasty MK; Khattab MF; ElShazly MI
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 34472983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang H; Sun Z; Li L; Sun R; Zhang H
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 31924174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Methods of measuring intraocular pressure independently of central corneal thickness].
    Hager A; Wiegand W
    Ophthalmologe; 2008 Sep; 105(9):840-4. PubMed ID: 18438633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus?--a pilot study.
    Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Morad Y; Hartstein M; Avni I; Zadok D
    Cornea; 2009 Jun; 28(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 19421050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Comparison of the Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by the Corvis ST and Reichert 7CR Tonometers in Glaucoma Patients.
    Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okimoto S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170206. PubMed ID: 28095506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters.
    Rosa N; Lanza M; De Bernardo M; Signoriello G; Chiodini P
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 24506466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of the ocular response analyzer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Feizi S; Hashemloo A; Rastegarpour A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5887-91. PubMed ID: 21447674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
    Caglayan M; Sarac O; Kosekahya P; Erten S; Ayan B; Cagil N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27709370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intraocular pressure instrument reading comparisons after LASIK.
    Fan F; Li C; Li Y; Duan X; Pan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 88(7):850-4. PubMed ID: 21499165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
    Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Ocular response analyser measurements and central corneal thickness in ocular rosacea patients.
    Palamar M; Degirmenci C; Ertam I; Yagci A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 26971098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Billingsley SC; Patel AD; Halverson KD; Alldredge BR; Qualls C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 85(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 18521025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The corneal biomechanical properties of patients with Graves' orbitopathy].
    Zhang Y; She XX; Yu XJ; Chen LF; Shen LJ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 52(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 27094063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.