These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28081172)

  • 61. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effect of topical corneal anaesthesia on ocular response analyzer parameters: pilot study.
    Ehongo A; De Maertelaer V; Pourjavan S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 29(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 18545939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A clinical description of Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.
    Lau W; Pye D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 May; 52(6):2911-6. PubMed ID: 21273535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Versus Ocular Response Analyzer for Measuring Intraocular Pressure After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Masoudi A; Azari AA; Veisi A
    Cornea; 2018 Nov; 37(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 29877927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Corneal biomechanical properties in thyroid eye disease.
    Karabulut GO; Kaynak P; Altan C; Ozturker C; Aksoy EF; Demirok A; Yılmaz OF
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Jun; 30(6):299-304. PubMed ID: 24835350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4410-4. PubMed ID: 17003433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Corneal hysteresis in mucopolysaccharidosis I and VI.
    Fahnehjelm KT; Chen E; Winiarski J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 21232085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of intraocular pressure adjusted by central corneal thickness or corneal biomechanical properties as measured in glaucomatous eyes using noncontact tonometers and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Yaoeda K; Fukushima A; Shirakashi M; Fukuchi T
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():829-34. PubMed ID: 27274187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The use of the Ocular Response Analyser to determine corneal hysteresis in eyes before and after excimer laser refractive surgery.
    Shah S; Laiquzzaman M; Yeung I; Pan X; Roberts C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 19321376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry.
    Touboul D; Roberts C; Kérautret J; Garra C; Maurice-Tison S; Saubusse E; Colin J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 34(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 18361984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Corneal topometric, aberrometric and biomechanical parameters in mucopolysaccharidosis patients.
    Wasielica-Poslednik J; Schuster AK; Politino G; Marx-Gross S; Bell K; Pfeiffer N; Pitz S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218108. PubMed ID: 31246979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Goldmann applanation tonometry compared with corneal-compensated intraocular pressure in the evaluation of primary open-angle Glaucoma.
    Ehrlich JR; Radcliffe NM; Shimmyo M
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 12():52. PubMed ID: 23009074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Evaluation of Changes in Corneal Biomechanics in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis].
    Zimmermann N; Brandt S; Brünner J; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2019 Jun; 236(6):806-815. PubMed ID: 29514380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Hardin JS; Lee CI; Lane LF; Hester CC; Morshedi RG
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 256(10):1971-1976. PubMed ID: 30039270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with psoriasis and healthy subjects.
    Celik U; Aykut V; Celik B; Tas M; Yazgan S; Kaldrm H; Erdur SK
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Mar; 41(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 25503911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.
    Kynigopoulos M; Schlote T; Kotecha A; Tzamalis A; Pajic B; Haefliger I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 May; 225(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 18454372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.