256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28081288)
1. Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Pohl V; Thoma DS; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia-Garcia A; Taylor TD; Haas R; Hämmerle CH
J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Apr; 44(4):438-445. PubMed ID: 28081288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading.
Schincaglia GP; Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CH
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):1042-51. PubMed ID: 26425812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading.
Thoma DS; Haas R; Tutak M; Garcia A; Schincaglia GP; Hämmerle CH
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 25418606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-Year data.
Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Hämmerle CHF
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Dec; 45(12):1465-1474. PubMed ID: 30341961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short (6-mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (≥10-mm) dental implants: a randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up.
Bechara S; Kubilius R; Veronesi G; Pires JT; Shibli JA; Mangano FG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1097-1107. PubMed ID: 27402427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Shi JY; Gu YX; Qiao SC; Zhuang LF; Zhang XM; Lai HC
Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():324. PubMed ID: 26223254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation or 6-mm implants:A 5-year randomised controlled trial.
Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):315-326. PubMed ID: 31535100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up study of implants with turned or oxidized surfaces placed after sinus augmentation.
Jungner M; Legrell PE; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1380-7. PubMed ID: 25397801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical, radiographic and economic evaluation of short-6-mm implants and longer implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in moderately atrophic maxillae: A 3-year randomized clinical trial.
Shi JY; Lai YR; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Tonetti MS; Lai HC
J Clin Periodontol; 2021 May; 48(5):695-704. PubMed ID: 33570787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.
Yu H; Wang X; Qiu L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 27436543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short versus longer implants with osteotome sinus floor elevation for moderately atrophic posterior maxillae: A 1-year randomized clinical trial.
Shi JY; Li Y; Qiao SC; Gu YX; Xiong YY; Lai HC
J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Aug; 46(8):855-862. PubMed ID: 31124147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data.
Thoma DS; Haas R; Sporniak-Tutak K; Garcia A; Taylor TD; Tutak M; Pohl V; Hämmerle CHF
J Clin Periodontol; 2024 Apr; 51(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 38296249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short implants placed with or without grafting into atrophic sinuses: the 5-year results of a prospective randomized controlled study.
Nedir R; Nurdin N; Abi Najm S; El Hage M; Bischof M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):877-886. PubMed ID: 27296955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yan Q; Wu X; Su M; Hua F; Shi B
BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e029826. PubMed ID: 31662363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts--a 3-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
Fermergård R; Åstrand P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 19906268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single crowns in the posterior maxilla supported by either 11-mm long implants with sinus floor augmentation or by 6-mm long implants: A 10-year randomized controlled trial.
Guljé FL; Raghoebar GM; Gareb B; Vissink A; Meijer HJA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 37941089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-short versus standard-length dental implants in conjunction with osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Magdy M; Abdelkader MA; Alloush S; Fawzy El-Sayed KM; Nawwar AA; Shoeib M; ElNahass H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 23(4):520-529. PubMed ID: 34101342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twelve-Year Retrospective Follow-Up of Machined Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Radiographic and Peri-Implant Outcome.
Simion M; Gionso L; Grossi GB; Briguglio F; Fontana F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e343-51. PubMed ID: 24909448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fully vs. partially rough implants in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Stavropoulos A; Karring T; Kostopoulos L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 17224029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
de Souza AB; Sukekava F; Tolentino L; César-Neto JB; Garcez-Filho J; Araújo MG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 28994192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
