166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28081547)
1. Diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy by detection of minichromosome maintenance protein 5 in biliary brush cytology.
Keane MG; Huggett MT; Chapman MH; Johnson GJ; Webster GJ; Thorburn D; Mackay J; Pereira SP
Br J Cancer; 2017 Jan; 116(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 28081547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy by detection of minichromosome maintenance protein 5 in bile aspirates.
Ayaru L; Stoeber K; Webster GJ; Hatfield AR; Wollenschlaeger A; Okoturo O; Rashid M; Williams G; Pereira SP
Br J Cancer; 2008 May; 98(9):1548-54. PubMed ID: 18414413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct.
Vandervoort J; Soetikno RM; Montes H; Lichtenstein DR; Van Dam J; Ruymann FW; Cibas ES; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):322-7. PubMed ID: 10049415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T
J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of microsatellite marker loss of heterozygosity in accurate diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy from brush cytology samples.
Khalid A; Pal R; Sasatomi E; Swalsky P; Slivka A; Whitcomb D; Finkelstein S
Gut; 2004 Dec; 53(12):1860-5. PubMed ID: 15542529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of microRNA expression in brush cytology specimens improves the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary cancer.
Le N; Fillinger J; Szanyi S; Wichmann B; Nagy ZB; Ivády G; Burai M; Tarpay Á; Pozsár J; Pap Á; Molnár B; Csuka O; Bak M; Tulassay Z; Szmola R
Pancreatology; 2019 Sep; 19(6):873-879. PubMed ID: 31400934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Brush cytology evaluation of lesions encountered during ERCP.
Scudera PL; Koizumi J; Jacobson IM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1990; 36(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 2163940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Performance of Bile Duct Brush Cytology with Risk of Malignancy of Standardized Categories in the Wake of World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rath A; Pradeep I; Nigam JS
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(6):639-649. PubMed ID: 37879315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of IGF2BP3, HOXB7, and NEK2 mRNA expression in brush cytology specimens as a new diagnostic tool in patients with biliary strictures.
Nischalke HD; Schmitz V; Luda C; Aldenhoff K; Berger C; Feldmann G; Sauerbruch T; Spengler U; Nattermann J
PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42141. PubMed ID: 22879911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology.
Kobayashi M; Ryozawa S; Araki R; Nagata K; Tanisaka Y; Fujita A; Kobatake T
Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 58(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 30146607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology.
Aly FZ; Mostofizadeh S; Jawaid S; Knapik J; Mukhtar F; Klein R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 32770823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biliary brush cytology in the assessment of biliary strictures at a tertiary center in Iran.
Mohammad Alizadeh AH; Mousavi M; Salehi B; Molaei M; Khodadoostan M; Afzali ES; Dadvar Z; Mirsattari D; Aghdaei HA; Lahmi F; Zali MR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2793-6. PubMed ID: 22320994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In situ hybridization for telomerase RNA in routine cytologic brushings for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancies.
Morales CP; Burdick JS; Saboorian MH; Wright WE; Shay JW
Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Oct; 48(4):402-5. PubMed ID: 9786114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Ryan ME; Baldauf MC
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):133-9. PubMed ID: 8013809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
