134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28081880)
1. Prognostic value of endocervical sampling following loop excision of high grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Cui Y; Sangi-Haghpeykar H; Patsner B; Bump JMM; Williams-Brown MY; Binder GL; Masand RP; Anderson ML
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Mar; 144(3):547-552. PubMed ID: 28081880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of endocervical curettage during loop electrosurgical excision procedures in predicting persistent/recurrent preinvasive cervical disease.
Cuello MA; Espinosa ME; Orlandini EJ; Hwang DY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 141(3):337-343. PubMed ID: 29509961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen LM; Liu L; Tao X; He Y; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):534-540. PubMed ID: 31461810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) plus top hat for HIV-infected women with endocervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Kenya.
Chung MH; De Vuyst H; Greene SA; Topazian HM; Sayed S; Moloo Z; Cagle A; Nyongesa-Malava E; Luchters S; Temmerman M; Sakr SR; Mugo NR; McGrath CJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 152(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 33145753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of endocervical curettage in follow-up for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stage 2+ after loop electrosurgical excision.
Cao D; Shen K; Chen Y; Xu Y; Wu D
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):584-589. PubMed ID: 32586604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease.
Tyler LN; Andrews N; Parrish RS; Hazlett LJ; Korourian S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):622-4. PubMed ID: 17425396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recurrent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Excision Procedure Versus Loop Procedure With Top Hat.
Francoeur AA; Furey KB; Ramirez J; Klomhaus AM; Holschneider C; Garcia LM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jul; 27(3):193-197. PubMed ID: 37285236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing persistence or recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Malapati R; Chaparala S; Cejtin HE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Jul; 15(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 21716049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Baloglu A; Uysal D; Bezircioglu I; Bicer M; Inci A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 282(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 19940997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of second pass in loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Kim K; Kang SB; Chung HH; Lee TS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Korean Med Sci; 2009 Feb; 24(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 19270822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting persistent/recurrent disease in the cervix after excisional biopsy.
Ramchandani SM; Houck KL; Hernandez E; Gaughan JP
MedGenMed; 2007 Apr; 9(2):24. PubMed ID: 17955080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tumor persistence in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive surgical margin post loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Sankasem A; Thavaramara T; Manusirivithaya S; Tangjitgamol S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jul; 89(7):934-40. PubMed ID: 16881423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HPV DNA test and Pap smear in detection of residual and recurrent disease following loop electrosurgical excision procedure of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Andrade LA; Tambascia J; Morais SS; Syrjänen KJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jul; 94(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 15262139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN.
Jing L; Dan W; Zhunan L; Ying X; Yi C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):805-812. PubMed ID: 30167855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
