231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28082896)
1. Effect of Aging on Motor Inhibition during Action Preparation under Sensory Conflict.
Duque J; Petitjean C; Swinnen SP
Front Aging Neurosci; 2016; 8():322. PubMed ID: 28082896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Top-down suppression of incompatible motor activations during response selection under conflict.
Klein PA; Petitjean C; Olivier E; Duque J
Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():138-49. PubMed ID: 23939021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.
Derosiere G; Klein PA; Nozaradan S; Zénon A; Mouraux A; Duque J
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9486-9504. PubMed ID: 30201772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response competition in the primary motor cortex: corticospinal excitability reflects response replacement during simple decisions.
Michelet T; Duncan GH; Cisek P
J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 104(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 20445034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.
Marini F; Demeter E; Roberts KC; Chelazzi L; Woldorff MG
J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 26791226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preparatory inhibition: Impact of choice in reaction time tasks.
Quoilin C; Fievez F; Duque J
Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():212-222. PubMed ID: 31015024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using a Double-Coil TMS Protocol to Assess Preparatory Inhibition Bilaterally.
Vassiliadis P; Grandjean J; Derosiere G; de Wilde Y; Quemener L; Duque J
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():139. PubMed ID: 29568258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative relation between conflict and response inhibition in the Flanker task.
Takezawa T; Miyatani M
Psychol Rep; 2005 Oct; 97(2):515-26. PubMed ID: 16342579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Double-Coil TMS Method to Assess Corticospinal Excitability Changes at a Near-Simultaneous Time in the Two Hands during Movement Preparation.
Wilhelm E; Quoilin C; Petitjean C; Duque J
Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():88. PubMed ID: 27014020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological correlates of block-wise strategic adaptations to consciously and unconsciously triggered conflict.
Jiang J; van Gaal S; Bailey K; Chen A; Zhang Q
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2791-8. PubMed ID: 24055539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflicting sensory information sharpens the neural representations of early selective visuospatial attention.
Sookprao P; Benjasupawan K; Phangwiwat T; Chatnuntawech I; Lertladaluck K; Gutchess A; Chunharas C; Itthipuripat S
J Neurosci; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38955488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observation of an action with a congruent contextual background facilitates corticospinal excitability: A combined TMS and eye-tracking experiment.
Riach M; Holmes PS; Franklin ZC; Wright DJ
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():157-164. PubMed ID: 30098329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
Clayson PE; Larson MJ
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential modulation of (bottom-up) response activation and inhibition in a response conflict task: a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Treccani B; Cona G; Milanese N; Umiltà C
Psychol Res; 2018 Jul; 82(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 28393259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict.
Zmigrod S; Zmigrod L; Hommel B
Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():320-5. PubMed ID: 26924018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On how the motor cortices resolve an inter-hemispheric response conflict: an event-related EEG potential-guided TMS study of the flankers task.
Verleger R; Kuniecki M; Möller F; Fritzmannova M; Siebner HR
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(2):318-26. PubMed ID: 19614982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proactive Inhibition Activation Depends on Motor Preparation: A Single Pulse TMS Study.
Ficarella SC; Battelli L
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1891. PubMed ID: 30364148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
