These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28082896)
1. Effect of Aging on Motor Inhibition during Action Preparation under Sensory Conflict. Duque J; Petitjean C; Swinnen SP Front Aging Neurosci; 2016; 8():322. PubMed ID: 28082896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Top-down suppression of incompatible motor activations during response selection under conflict. Klein PA; Petitjean C; Olivier E; Duque J Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():138-49. PubMed ID: 23939021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions. Derosiere G; Klein PA; Nozaradan S; Zénon A; Mouraux A; Duque J J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9486-9504. PubMed ID: 30201772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response competition in the primary motor cortex: corticospinal excitability reflects response replacement during simple decisions. Michelet T; Duncan GH; Cisek P J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 104(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 20445034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study. Marini F; Demeter E; Roberts KC; Chelazzi L; Woldorff MG J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 26791226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preparatory inhibition: Impact of choice in reaction time tasks. Quoilin C; Fievez F; Duque J Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():212-222. PubMed ID: 31015024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using a Double-Coil TMS Protocol to Assess Preparatory Inhibition Bilaterally. Vassiliadis P; Grandjean J; Derosiere G; de Wilde Y; Quemener L; Duque J Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():139. PubMed ID: 29568258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative relation between conflict and response inhibition in the Flanker task. Takezawa T; Miyatani M Psychol Rep; 2005 Oct; 97(2):515-26. PubMed ID: 16342579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2. Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict. Lamers MJ; Roelofs A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Double-Coil TMS Method to Assess Corticospinal Excitability Changes at a Near-Simultaneous Time in the Two Hands during Movement Preparation. Wilhelm E; Quoilin C; Petitjean C; Duque J Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():88. PubMed ID: 27014020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological correlates of block-wise strategic adaptations to consciously and unconsciously triggered conflict. Jiang J; van Gaal S; Bailey K; Chen A; Zhang Q Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2791-8. PubMed ID: 24055539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observation of an action with a congruent contextual background facilitates corticospinal excitability: A combined TMS and eye-tracking experiment. Riach M; Holmes PS; Franklin ZC; Wright DJ Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():157-164. PubMed ID: 30098329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory. Clayson PE; Larson MJ Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential modulation of (bottom-up) response activation and inhibition in a response conflict task: a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Treccani B; Cona G; Milanese N; Umiltà C Psychol Res; 2018 Jul; 82(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 28393259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict. Zmigrod S; Zmigrod L; Hommel B Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():320-5. PubMed ID: 26924018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner. Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On how the motor cortices resolve an inter-hemispheric response conflict: an event-related EEG potential-guided TMS study of the flankers task. Verleger R; Kuniecki M; Möller F; Fritzmannova M; Siebner HR Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(2):318-26. PubMed ID: 19614982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proactive Inhibition Activation Depends on Motor Preparation: A Single Pulse TMS Study. Ficarella SC; Battelli L Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1891. PubMed ID: 30364148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motor-evoked potentials reveal functional differences between dominant and non-dominant motor cortices during response preparation. Poole BJ; Mather M; Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA Cortex; 2018 Jun; 103():1-12. PubMed ID: 29533856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]