BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28083195)

  • 1. Evaluation of RxNorm in Ambulatory Electronic Prescribing.
    Bell DS; O'Neill SM; Reynolds K; Schoeff D
    Rand Health Q; 2011; 1(3):8. PubMed ID: 28083195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting Potential Medication Selection Errors During Outpatient Pharmacy Processing of Electronic Prescriptions With the RxNorm Application Programming Interface: Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.
    Lester CA; Tu L; Ding Y; Flynn AJ
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e16073. PubMed ID: 32044760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the implementation of RxNorm in ambulatory electronic prescriptions.
    Dhavle AA; Ward-Charlerie S; Rupp MT; Kilbourne J; Amin VP; Ruiz J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e99-e107. PubMed ID: 26510879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of National Drug Code Identifiers in Ambulatory E-Prescribing.
    Dhavle AA; Ward-Charlerie S; Rupp MT; Amin VP; Ruiz J
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Nov; 21(11):1025-31. PubMed ID: 26521114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and Variability of Patient Directions in Electronic Prescriptions in the Ambulatory Care Setting.
    Yang Y; Ward-Charlerie S; Dhavle AA; Rupp MT; Green J
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Jul; 24(7):691-699. PubMed ID: 29345553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of Prescribers' Notes in Electronic Prescriptions in Ambulatory Practice.
    Dhavle AA; Yang Y; Rupp MT; Singh H; Ward-Charlerie S; Ruiz J
    JAMA Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 176(4):463-70. PubMed ID: 26954486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From physician intent to the pharmacy label: prevalence and description of discrepancies from a cross-sectional evaluation of electronic prescriptions.
    Cochran GL; Klepser DG; Morien M; Lomelin D; Schainost R; Lander L
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Mar; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 24106311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of community chain pharmacists' interventions on electronic prescriptions.
    Warholak TL; Rupp MT
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2009; 49(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19196598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Addition of electronic prescription transmission to computerized prescriber order entry: Effect on dispensing errors in community pharmacies.
    Moniz TT; Seger AC; Keohane CA; Seger DL; Bates DW; Rothschild JM
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2011 Jan; 68(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21200064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards creating the perfect electronic prescription.
    Dhavle AA; Rupp MT
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Apr; 22(e1):e7-e12. PubMed ID: 25038197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do Australian consumers, pharmacists and prescribers think about documenting indications on prescriptions and dispensed medicines labels?: A qualitative study.
    Garada M; McLachlan AJ; Schiff GD; Lehnbom EC
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Nov; 17(1):734. PubMed ID: 29141618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the variability of ingredient, strength, and dose form information from electronic prescriptions with RxNorm drug product descriptions.
    Lester CA; Flynn AJ; Marshall VD; Rochowiak S; Rowell B; Bagian JP
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Aug; 29(9):1471-1479. PubMed ID: 35773948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilizing RxNorm to support practical computing applications: capturing medication history in live electronic health records.
    Bennett CC
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Aug; 45(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 22426081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. E-prescribing errors identified in a compounding pharmacy: a quality-improvement project.
    Reed-Kane D; Kittell K; Adkins J; Flocks S; Nguyen T
    Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 24881345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: a focus group study.
    Weingart SN; Massagli M; Cyrulik A; Isaac T; Morway L; Sands DZ; Weissman JS
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Sep; 78(9):571-8. PubMed ID: 19395307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a Nationwide e-Prescribing System.
    Motulsky A; Liang M; Moreault MP; Borycki E; Kushniruk A; Sicotte C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():714-718. PubMed ID: 31438017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of electronic prescription on reducing medication errors in an Egyptian outpatient clinic.
    Kenawy AS; Kett V
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jul; 127():80-87. PubMed ID: 31128835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancing the drug ontology with semantically-rich representations of National Drug Codes and RxNorm unique concept identifiers.
    Bona JP; Brochhausen M; Hogan WR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 21):708. PubMed ID: 31865907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Early Electronic Prescribing on Pharmacists' Clarification Calls in Four Community Pharmacies Located in St John's, Newfoundland.
    Phillips JL; Shea JM; Leung V; MacDonald D
    JMIR Med Inform; 2015 Jan; 3(1):e2. PubMed ID: 25595165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Formulary & benefit and real-time pharmacy Benefit: Electronic standards delivering value to prescribers and pharmacists.
    Babbrah P; Solomon MR; Stember LA; Hill JW; Weiker M
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2023; 63(3):725-730. PubMed ID: 36842895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.