BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28083772)

  • 1. Pupillary correlates of covert shifts of attention during working memory maintenance.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):782-795. PubMed ID: 28083772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pupillary light response reflects visual working memory content.
    Hustá C; Dalmaijer E; Belopolsky A; Mathôt S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1522-1528. PubMed ID: 31436453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using task effort and pupil size to track covert shifts of visual attention independently of a pupillary light reflex.
    Brocher A; Harbecke R; Graf T; Memmert D; Hüttermann S
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2551-2567. PubMed ID: 29516414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pupillary light response reflects encoding, but not maintenance, in visual working memory.
    Blom T; Mathôt S; Olivers CN; Van der Stigchel S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1716-1723. PubMed ID: 27428779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.
    Tas AC; Luck SJ; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1121-1138. PubMed ID: 26854532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracking working memory maintenance with pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):461-484. PubMed ID: 29204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attending object features interferes with visual working memory regardless of eye-movements.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1049-1061. PubMed ID: 31021157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pupillary light response reflects exogenous attention and inhibition of return.
    Mathôt S; Dalmaijer E; Grainger J; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2014 Dec; 14(14):7. PubMed ID: 25761284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.
    Santangelo V; Finoia P; Raffone A; Belardinelli MO; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 17763843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.
    Hollingworth A; Maxcey-Richard AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1047-58. PubMed ID: 23067118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):621-32. PubMed ID: 26754949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pupillary light response reflects eye-movement preparation.
    Mathôt S; van der Linden L; Grainger J; Vitu F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 25621584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Crawford JD; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):413-427. PubMed ID: 27822732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective Selection in Visual and Tactile Working Memory Is Mediated by Shared Control Mechanisms.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 32(3):546-557. PubMed ID: 31659924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based attentional weighting and spreading in visual working memory.
    Niklaus M; Nobre AC; van Ede F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42384. PubMed ID: 28233830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention.
    Rerko L; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):712-28. PubMed ID: 24442551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.