These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Dermabrasion and microdermabrasion. Alkhawam L; Alam M Facial Plast Surg; 2009 Dec; 25(5):301-10. PubMed ID: 20024871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wrinkle and roughness measurement by the Antera 3D and its application for evaluation of cosmetic products. Messaraa C; Metois A; Walsh M; Hurley S; Doyle L; Mansfield A; O'Connor C; Mavon A Skin Res Technol; 2018 Aug; 24(3):359-366. PubMed ID: 29368349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of microdermabrasion on skin rejuvenation. Fernandes M; Pinheiro NM; Crema VO; Mendonça AC J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2014 Jan; 16(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 24131070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective controlled assessment of microdermabrasion for damaged skin and fine rhytides. Coimbra M; Rohrich RJ; Chao J; Brown SA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Apr; 113(5):1438-43; discussion 1444. PubMed ID: 15060359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of histologic and electron microscopic changes after novel treatment using combined microdermabrasion and ultrasound-induced phonophoresis of human skin. Dudelzak J; Hussain M; Phelps RG; Gottlieb GJ; Goldberg DJ J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2008 Dec; 10(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 19012051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An improved method for measurement of change in skin roughness caused by cleansing products under mild application conditions. Lee E; An S; Im MS; Kim HK; Lee TR Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 21332807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Approaches to document the efficacy and safety of microdermabrasion procedure. Spencer JM; Kurtz ES Dermatol Surg; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1353-7. PubMed ID: 17083587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evaluation of aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion for photodamage. Tan MH; Spencer JM; Pires LM; Ajmeri J; Skover G Dermatol Surg; 2001 Nov; 27(11):943-9. PubMed ID: 11737128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gradient-based 3D skin roughness rendering from an in-vivo skin image for dynamic haptic palpation. Vicente JI; Kim K Skin Res Technol; 2019 May; 25(3):305-317. PubMed ID: 30604497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin barrier function recovery after diamond microdermabrasion. Kim HS; Lim SH; Song JY; Kim MY; Lee JH; Park JG; Kim HO; Park YM J Dermatol; 2009 Oct; 36(10):529-33. PubMed ID: 19785706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between ultrasonography (Dermascan C version 3) and transparency profilometry (Skin Visiometer SV600). Lee HK; Seo YK; Baek JH; Koh JS Skin Res Technol; 2008 Feb; 14(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18211596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The epidermal and dermal changes associated with microdermabrasion. Freedman BM; Rueda-Pedraza E; Waddell SP Dermatol Surg; 2001 Dec; 27(12):1031-3; discussion 1033-4. PubMed ID: 11849265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microdermabrasion. Spencer JM Am J Clin Dermatol; 2005; 6(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 15799680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microdermabrasion: a clinical, histometric, and histopathologic study. El-Domyati M; Hosam W; Abdel-Azim E; Abdel-Wahab H; Mohamed E J Cosmet Dermatol; 2016 Dec; 15(4):503-513. PubMed ID: 27357600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo determination of skin surface topography using an optical 3D device. Jacobi U; Chen M; Frankowski G; Sinkgraven R; Hund M; Rzany B; Sterry W; Lademann J Skin Res Technol; 2004 Nov; 10(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 15479444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]