These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2808455)

  • 1. Experimental method for the in vitro testing of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses.
    Schneider E; Eulenberger J; Steiner W; Wyder D; Friedman RJ; Perren SM
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(6-7):735-44. PubMed ID: 2808455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial stability of a new hybrid fixation hip stem: experimental measurement of implant-bone micromotion under torsional load in comparison with cemented and cementless stems.
    Baleani M; Cristofolini L; Toni A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jun; 50(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 10756320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses.
    Schneider E; Kinast C; Eulenberger J; Wyder D; Eskilsson G; Perren SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):200-9. PubMed ID: 2805480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Micromotions in the primary fixation of cementless femoral stem prostheses.
    Gebauer D; Refior HJ; Haake M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1989; 108(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 2783022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computer-based biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion of cementless hip prostheses.
    Gilbert JL; Bloomfeld RS; Lautenschlager EP; Wixson RL
    J Biomech; 1992 Apr; 25(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 1583012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis.
    Götze C; Steens W; Vieth V; Poremba C; Claes L; Steinbeck J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2002 May; 17(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 12034119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial stability of fully and partially cemented femoral stems.
    Claes L; Fiedler S; Ohnmacht M; Duda GN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2000 Dec; 15(10):750-5. PubMed ID: 11050357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction.
    Chareancholvanich K; Bourgeault CA; Schmidt AH; Gustilo RB; Lew WD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Jan; (394):290-302. PubMed ID: 11795746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient computational method for assessing the effects of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements.
    Bah MT; Nair PB; Taylor M; Browne M
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1417-22. PubMed ID: 21295306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examination of rotational fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. A mechanical study of micromovement and acoustic emission.
    Sugiyama H; Whiteside LA; Kaiser AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):122-8. PubMed ID: 2582663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrated CAD/CAM/robotic milling method for custom cementless femoral prostheses.
    Wen-ming X; Ai-min W; Qi W; Chang-hua L; Jian-fei Z; Fang-fang X
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Sep; 37(9):911-5. PubMed ID: 26210779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-loosening mechanical behavior of femoral resurfacing prostheses.
    Huiskes R; Strens P; Vroemen W; Slooff TJ
    Clin Mater; 1990; 6(1):37-55. PubMed ID: 10147513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shortening cemented femoral implants: an in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length.
    Wilson LJ; Roe JA; Pearcy MJ; Crawford RW
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):934-9. PubMed ID: 22146384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling.
    Maloney WJ; Jasty M; Burke DW; O'Connor DO; Zalenski EB; Bragdon C; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):129-40. PubMed ID: 2582664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of a distally interlocked press-fit femoral total hip prosthesis.
    Mahomed N; Schatzker J; Hearn T
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Apr; 8(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 8478629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions.
    Chong DY; Hansen UN; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 2010 Apr; 43(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 20189576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Micromotion-induced peri-prosthetic fluid flow around a cementless femoral stem.
    Malfroy Camine V; Terrier A; Pioletti DP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(7):730-736. PubMed ID: 28271719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model.
    Nakahara I; Takao M; Bandoh S; Bertollo N; Walsh WR; Sugano N
    J Orthop Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 23097319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.