These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2808455)

  • 21. Biomechanical evaluation of different offset versions of a cementless hip prosthesis by 3-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
    Fottner A; Peter CV; Schmidutz F; Wanke-Jellinek L; Schröder C; Mazoochian F; Jansson V
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Oct; 26(8):830-5. PubMed ID: 21536357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanics of the femoral component of total hip prostheses with particular reference to the stress in the bone-cement.
    Yettram AL; Wright KW
    J Biomed Eng; 1979 Oct; 1(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 537354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Full-field measurement of micromotion around a cementless femoral stem using micro-CT imaging and radiopaque markers.
    Malfroy Camine V; Rüdiger HA; Pioletti DP; Terrier A
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):4002-4008. PubMed ID: 27823803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Radiologic aspects of the loosening of cemented hip prostheses: mechanical, septic or granulomatous etiology?].
    Malghem J; Mosseray A; Vande Berg B; Lebon C; Maldague B
    J Belge Radiol; 1997 Aug; 80(4):173-84. PubMed ID: 9410868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Femoral bone remodeling: clinical experience with cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Toni A; Sudanese A; Bueno AL; Marraro MD; Tabarroni M; Innao V; Giunti A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1992; 77(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 1297576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Initial stability of a collarless wedge-shaped prosthesis in the femoral canal.
    Sharkey PF; Albert TJ; Hume EL; Rothman RH
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 10149562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the secondary stability of coated cementless hip replacement: parameters that affected interface strength.
    Orlik J; Zhurov A; Middleton J
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Dec; 25(10):825-31. PubMed ID: 14630470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanics of cemented and cementless prostheses.
    Jasty M; Burke D; Harris WH
    Chir Organi Mov; 1992; 77(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 1297569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cementless hip implants: an expanding choice.
    Giebaly DE; Twaij H; Ibrahim M; Haddad FS
    Hip Int; 2016 Sep; 26(5):413-423. PubMed ID: 27689504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro examination of the primary stability of three press-fit acetabular cups under consideration of two different bearing couples.
    Jahnke A; Bott CC; Fonseca Ulloa CA; Jahnke GW; Rickert M; Ishaque BA; Ahmed GA
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 May; 67():49-54. PubMed ID: 30902521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A biomechanical testing system to determine micromotion between hip implant and femur accounting for deformation of the hip implant: Assessment of the influence of rigid body assumptions on micromotions measurements.
    Leuridan S; Goossens Q; Roosen J; Pastrav L; Denis K; Mulier M; Desmet W; Vander Sloten J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Feb; 42():70-78. PubMed ID: 28110243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pelvic periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement around cemented vs cementless acetabular prostheses.
    Jayasuriya RL; Wilkinson JM
    J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 24161791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative micromotion of fully and proximally cemented femoral stems.
    Bachus KN; Bloebaum RD; Jones RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Sep; (366):248-57. PubMed ID: 10627742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A three-dimensional non-linear finite element study of the effect of cement-prosthesis debonding in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(11):1047-58. PubMed ID: 1761581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pre-clinical testing of hip prosthetic designs: a comparison of finite element calculations and laboratory tests.
    Verdonschot NJ; Huiskes R; Freeman MA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1993; 207(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 8117366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intraoperative measurement of rotational stability of femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
    Harris WH; Mulroy RD; Maloney WJ; Burke DW; Chandler HP; Zalenski EB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 May; (266):119-26. PubMed ID: 2019039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fixation of the shorter cementless GTS™ stem: biomechanical comparison between a conventional and an innovative implant design.
    Nadorf J; Thomsen M; Gantz S; Sonntag R; Kretzer JP
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 May; 134(5):719-26. PubMed ID: 24522862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.