These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28084937)

  • 1. Mechanisms of friction and assessment of slip resistance of new and used footwear soles on contaminated floors.
    Grönqvist R
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):224-241. PubMed ID: 28084937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of roughness, floor polish, water, oil and ice on underfoot friction: current safety footwear solings are less slip resistant than microcellular polyurethane.
    Manning DP; Jones C
    Appl Ergon; 2001 Apr; 32(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 11277511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the friction coefficient with different tread groove widths, floors and contaminants.
    Li KW; Wu HH; Lin YC
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Nov; 37(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 16427022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An apparatus and a method for determining the slip resistance of shoes and floors by simulation of human foot motions.
    Grönqvist R; Roine J; Järvinen E; Korhonen E
    Ergonomics; 1989 Aug; 32(8):979-95. PubMed ID: 2806228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of shoe soling tread groove width on the coefficient of friction with different sole materials, floors, and contaminants.
    Li KW; Chen CJ
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Nov; 35(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15374757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shoe sole tread designs and outcomes of slipping and falling on slippery floor surfaces.
    Liu LW; Lee YH; Lin CJ; Li KW; Chen CY
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68989. PubMed ID: 23894388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in Friction Performance between New and Worn Shoes.
    Cook A; Hemler S; Sundaram V; Chanda A; Beschorner K
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2020; 8(4):209-214. PubMed ID: 33955322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Slip resistant properties of footwear on ice.
    Gao C; Abeysekera J; Hirvonen M; Grönqvist R
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 15204296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of footwear sole hardness on slip initiation in young adults.
    Tsai YJ; Powers CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):884-8. PubMed ID: 18482376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Traction performance across the life of slip-resistant footwear: Preliminary results from a longitudinal study.
    Hemler SL; Pliner EM; Redfern MS; Haight JM; Beschorner KE
    J Safety Res; 2020 Sep; 74():219-225. PubMed ID: 32951786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of shoe sole tread groove depth on the gait parameters during walking on dry and slippery surface.
    Ziaei M; Nabavi SH; Mokhtarinia HR; Tabatabai Ghomshe SF
    Int J Occup Environ Med; 2013 Jan; 4(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 23279795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of slipping resistance of footwear and floor surfaces. Influence of manufacture and utilization of the products.
    Leclercq S; Tisserand M; Saulnier H
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 28084935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting slips based on the STM 603 whole-footwear tribometer under different coefficient of friction testing conditions.
    Beschorner KE; Iraqi A; Redfern MS; Cham R; Li Y
    Ergonomics; 2019 May; 62(5):668-681. PubMed ID: 30638144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity and reliability of a portable slip meter for determining floor slipperiness during simulated heel strike.
    Grönqvist R; Hirvonen M; Rajamäki E; Matz S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2003 Mar; 35(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 12504142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coefficient of friction testing parameters influence the prediction of human slips.
    Iraqi A; Cham R; Redfern MS; Beschorner KE
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():118-126. PubMed ID: 29866300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a high slip-resistant footwear outsole using a hybrid rubber surface pattern.
    Yamaguchi T; Hokkirigawa K
    Ind Health; 2014; 52(5):414-23. PubMed ID: 25055846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Slipperiness of the shoe-floor interface: comparison of objective and subjective assessments.
    Grönqvist R; Hirvonen M; Tuusa A
    Appl Ergon; 1993 Aug; 24(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 15676921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of slip resistance under footwear materials, tread designs, floor contamination, and floor inclination conditions.
    Li KW; Chen CY; Chen CC; Liu L
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():3349-51. PubMed ID: 22317227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gait kinetics impact shoe tread wear rate.
    Hemler SL; Sider JR; Redfern MS; Beschorner KE
    Gait Posture; 2021 May; 86():157-161. PubMed ID: 33735824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Worn region size of shoe outsole impacts human slips: Testing a mechanistic model.
    Sundaram VH; Hemler SL; Chanda A; Haight JM; Redfern MS; Beschorner KE
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 105():109797. PubMed ID: 32423543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.