95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28085690)
21. [Comparison of sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass and minimally invasive technique for isolated single vessel grafting].
Wu Y; Gao CQ; Yang M; Xiao CS; Liu GP
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 92(14):974-6. PubMed ID: 22781571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Sequential internal mammary-coronary artery bypass].
Yamaguchi A; Suma H; Kondou K; Maeda M; Oku T; Fukumoto H; Kimura H; Sato H; Hasegawa S; Sawada Y
Kyobu Geka; 1989 Sep; 42(10):818-21. PubMed ID: 2796071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Anterolateral right thoracotomy for mitral valve procedure after previous coronary artery bypass grafting with functioning internal mammary artery grafts.
Yoda M; Minami K; Fritzsche D; Bairaktaris A; Koerfer R
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2005 Feb; 46(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 15758878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimally invasive coronary bypass using internal thoracic arteries via a left minithoracotomy: "the Nambiar Technique".
Nambiar P; Mittal C
Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(6):420-6. PubMed ID: 24356432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Experiences in robotically enhanced IMA-preparation as initial step towards totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.
Reuthebuch O; Comber M; Grünenfelder J; Zünd G; Turina M
Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Dec; 11(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 14627971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Single versus multiple internal mammary artery grafting for coronary artery bypass: 15-year follow-up of a clinical practice trial.
Burfeind WR; Glower DD; Wechsler AS; Tuttle RH; Shaw LK; Harrell FE; Rankin JS
Circulation; 2004 Sep; 110(11 Suppl 1):II27-35. PubMed ID: 15364834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective study of feasibility of routine use of multiple internal mammary artery anastomoses.
Green GE; Sosa JA; Cameron A
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1989; 30(4):643-7. PubMed ID: 2777874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Thoracoscopic internal mammary artery harvesting: technical considerations.
Nataf P; Lima L; Regan M; Benarim S; Ramadan R; Pavie A; Gandjbakhch I
Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 Jun; 63(6 Suppl):S104-6. PubMed ID: 9203611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The "T-MIDCAB" procedure. Use of extension grafts from the undisturbed internal mammary artery in high-risk patients.
Coulson AS; Bakhshay SA
Heart Surg Forum; 1998; 1(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 11276441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical results of sequential and "Y" grafting with the internal mammary artery].
Masuda T; Tanimoto Y; Kobayashi Y; Hayashi K; Sakata K; Aoki M
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jul; 38(7):1168-71. PubMed ID: 1976714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Thirty-year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups.
Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Galbut DL; Zucker M; Ebra G
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Jul; 90(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 20609757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Early and late outcome of skeletonised bilateral internal mammary arteries anastomosed to the left coronary system.
Bonacchi M; Battaglia F; Prifti E; Leacche M; Nathan NS; Sani G; Popoff G
Heart; 2005 Feb; 91(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 15657231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Location of the second internal mammary artery graft does not influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting.
Kurlansky PA; Traad EA; Dorman MJ; Galbut DL; Zucker M; Ebra G
Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 May; 91(5):1378-83; discussion 1383-4. PubMed ID: 21435631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction and coronary artery bypass grafting: an anatomical study and clinical implications.
Rozen WM; Ye X; Guio-Aguilar PL; Alonso-Burgos A; Goldblatt J; Ashton MW; Whitaker IS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jul; 134(1):181-98. PubMed ID: 22270931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients.
Mohr FW; Falk V; Diegeler A; Walther T; Gummert JF; Bucerius J; Jacobs S; Autschbach R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 May; 121(5):842-53. PubMed ID: 11326227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery with bilateral or single internal mammary artery grafts.
Rosenblum JM; Harskamp RE; Hoedemaker N; Walker P; Liberman HA; de Winter RJ; Vassiliades TA; Puskas JD; Halkos ME
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):1081-9. PubMed ID: 26687889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using the bilateral internal mammary artery in the left or right coronary artery system: 5-year comparison of operation techniques and angiographic results.
Toker ME; Omeroglu SN; Kirali K; Balkanay M; Yakut C
Heart Surg Forum; 2005; 8(6):E462-7. PubMed ID: 16286279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues.
Bonatti J; Schachner T; Bernecker O; Chevtchik O; Bonaros N; Ott H; Friedrich G; Weidinger F; Laufer G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Feb; 127(2):504-10. PubMed ID: 14762361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mammary artery harvesting using the Da Vinci Si robotic system.
Canale LS; Bonatti J
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2014; 29(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 24896171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting on beating heart].
Gao CQ; Wu Y; Yang M; Wang G; Wang JL; Wang MY; Li LX; Zhao Y
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 49(10):923-6. PubMed ID: 22321684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
