These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28085901)

  • 1. Task-Difficulty Homeostasis in Car Following Models: Experimental Validation Using Self-Paced Visual Occlusion.
    Pekkanen J; Lappi O; Itkonen TH; Summala H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169704. PubMed ID: 28085901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optical information for car following: the driving by visual angle (DVA) model.
    Andersen GJ; Sauer CW
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):878-96. PubMed ID: 17915604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a general theory of driver behaviour.
    Fuller R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 May; 37(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 15784200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preferred time headway in car-following and individual differences in perceptual-motor skills.
    van Winsum W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):863-73. PubMed ID: 9885050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. That's close enough--a threshold effect of time headway on the experience of risk, task difficulty, effort, and comfort.
    Lewis-Evans B; De Waard D; Brookhuis KA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1926-33. PubMed ID: 20728644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator.
    Broughton KL; Switzer F; Scott D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jan; 39(1):106-16. PubMed ID: 16962059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of headway distance and car speed on drivers' decisions to answer an incoming call.
    Pouyakian M; Mahabadi HA; Yazdi SM; Hajizadeh E; Nahvi A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 23944976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction.
    Noy YI; Lemoine TL; Klachan C; Burns PC
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 15145283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time headway in car following and operational performance during unexpected braking.
    van Winsum W; Brouwer W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1247-57. PubMed ID: 9229443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of using a portable music player on simulated driving performance and task-sharing strategies.
    Young KL; Mitsopoulos-Rubens E; Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):738-46. PubMed ID: 22118952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trade-off between jerk and time headway as an indicator of driving style.
    Itkonen TH; Pekkanen J; Lappi O; Kosonen I; Luttinen T; Summala H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185856. PubMed ID: 29040291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occlusion as a measure for visual workload: an overview of TNO occlusion research in car driving.
    van der Horst R
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 15145281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring radio programs and time of day affect simulated car-driving performance.
    Jäncke L; Musial F; Vogt J; Kalveram KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 2):484-6. PubMed ID: 7808886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of driver distraction near the tipping point of traffic flow stability.
    Cooper JM; Vladisavljevic I; Medeiros-Ward N; Martin PT; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 19653488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?
    He J; Chaparro A; Nguyen B; Burge RJ; Crandall J; Chaparro B; Ni R; Cao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():287-95. PubMed ID: 25089769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of advertising billboards during simulated driving.
    Edquist J; Horberry T; Hosking S; Johnston I
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):619-26. PubMed ID: 20864087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of visual and cognitive distractions on operational and tactical driving behaviors.
    Zhang Y; Kaber DB; Rogers M; Liang Y; Gangakhedkar S
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):592-604. PubMed ID: 24930178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do drivers maintain short headways in fog? A driving-simulator study evaluating feeling of risk and lateral control during automated and manual car following.
    Saffarian M; Happee R; Winter JC
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):971-85. PubMed ID: 22804738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.
    Ho C; Reed N; Spence C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):988-96. PubMed ID: 16697344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.