These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28085974)

  • 1. Intraoral Scanning Systems: Need for Maintenance.
    Rehmann P; Sichwardt V; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):27-29. PubMed ID: 28085974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
    Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis.
    Nedelcu RG; Persson AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1461-71. PubMed ID: 25134995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners.
    Flügge TV; Att W; Metzger MC; Nelson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 27148990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23641661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations.
    Galhano GÁ; Pellizzer EP; Mazaro JV
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e575-9. PubMed ID: 23172483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
    Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].
    Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
    Güth JF; Runkel C; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Keul C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.
    Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two intraoral scanners based on three-dimensional surface analysis.
    Lee KM
    Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 29430612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors.
    Abduo J; Elseyoufi M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):101-121. PubMed ID: 29989757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Attin T; Mehl A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1495-504. PubMed ID: 26547869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study.
    Andriessen FS; Rijkens DR; van der Meer WJ; Wismeijer DW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 24210732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limited evidence suggests complete arch digital scans are less time efficient than conventional impression.
    Sedky A; Abd-Elwahab Radi I
    Evid Based Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(4):138-139. PubMed ID: 33339976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral and extraoral scanners: an in vitro study using a new method of evaluation.
    Muallah J; Wesemann C; Nowak R; Robben J; Mah J; Pospiech P; Bumann A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(2):151-164. PubMed ID: 28630956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method.
    Nagy Z; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans Z; Renne W; Vág J
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32264943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners.
    Bohner LOL; De Luca Canto G; Marció BS; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Tortamano Neto P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):617-623. PubMed ID: 28385434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.