These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28085976)

  • 1. Clinical Fit of Partial Removable Dental Prostheses Based on Alginate or Polyvinyl Siloxane Impressions.
    Fokkinga WA; Witter DJ; Bronkhorst EM; Creugers NH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 28085976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray.
    Hsu YT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of fit of partial denture metal framework with various framework design features using alginate as a final impression material: A prospective clinical study.
    Baig MR; Omar R
    J Dent; 2021 Apr; 107():103608. PubMed ID: 33609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated postinsertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics.
    Drago CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 14508741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Factors Affecting Partial Removable Dental Prostheses Framework Fit: A Clinical Prospective Study.
    Baig MR; Qudeimat M; Omar R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 31664265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The altered cast impression technique: anatomic and functional considerations.
    Stillwell KD
    Todays FDA; 2009 Aug; 21(8):19-21, 23. PubMed ID: 19728461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impression Procedures for Metal Frame Removable Partial Dentures as Applied by General Dental Practitioners.
    Fokkinga WA; van Uchelen J; Witter DJ; Mulder J; Creugers NH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 26929957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of excessive movable tissue: a modified impression technique.
    Shum MH; Pow EH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 24461949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of polyvinyl siloxane for complete and partial denture impressions.
    Sami I; Eid HI; Alsayed SM
    Egypt Dent J; 1990 Apr; 36(2):173-89. PubMed ID: 2103905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Altered polyurethane cast for a partial removable dental prosthesis.
    Lee JH; Cho SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 25935083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relating the marginal fit of the castings to the accuracy of the impressions made from laminated hydrocolloid impression technique: a comparative study.
    Sinha MR; Thakur B; Gaikwad A; Chaudhari LD; Kulkarni A; Kulkarni H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Mar; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
    Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics. Part 1: edentulous impressions.
    Massad JJ; Cagna DR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Aug; 28(8):452-9; quiz 460, 470. PubMed ID: 18578103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A maxillomandibular record for a removable partial denture by using polyvinyl siloxane and the metal framework: A dental technique.
    Cortes Trevino DA; Razzoog ME; Saglik B; Nascimento Machado Gouveia DD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):723-725. PubMed ID: 32493570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the stability of maxillaiy dentures: the use of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials for edentulous impressions.
    Massad J; Davis WJ; Lobel W; June R; Thornton J
    Dent Today; 2005 Feb; 24(2):118, 120-3; quiz 123, 140. PubMed ID: 15768945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.