211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28087075)
21. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat.
Kohal RJ; Wolkewitz M; Hinze M; Han JS; Bächle M; Butz F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19298287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces.
Lang MS; Cerutis DR; Miyamoto T; Nunn ME
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Roehling S; Schlegel KA; Woelfler H; Gahlert M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 May; 30(5):365-395. PubMed ID: 30916812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bone tissue response to experimental zirconia implants.
Mihatovic I; Golubovic V; Becker J; Schwarz F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 27501958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction.
Kohal RJ; Patzelt SB; Butz F; Sahlin H
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 23506654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment.
Kohal RJ; Weng D; Bächle M; Strub JR
J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1262-8. PubMed ID: 15515343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gingival fibroblasts behavior on bioactive zirconia and titanium dental implant surfaces produced by a functionally graded technique.
Cruz MBD; Marques JF; Fernandes BF; Costa M; Miranda G; Mata ADSPD; Carames JMM; Silva FS
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20200100. PubMed ID: 32667382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Osseointegration of zirconia implants: an SEM observation of the bone-implant interface.
Depprich R; Zipprich H; Ommerborn M; Mahn E; Lammers L; Handschel J; Naujoks C; Wiesmann HP; Kübler NR; Meyer U
Head Face Med; 2008 Nov; 4():25. PubMed ID: 18990214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laser surface treatment on Yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implants: Influence on cell behavior.
da Cruz MB; Marques JF; Fernandes BF; Pinto P; Madeira S; Carvalho Ó; Silva FS; Caramês JMM; da Mata ADSP
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Jan; 110(1):249-258. PubMed ID: 34278714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Human gingival fibroblasts function is stimulated on machined hydrided titanium zirconium dental implants.
Gómez-Florit M; Xing R; Ramis JM; Taxt-Lamolle S; Haugen HJ; Lyngstadaas SP; Monjo M
J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 24252800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differential Behavior of Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells on Structured Implant Abutment Materials: A Comparison of Materials and Surface Topographies.
Nothdurft FP; Fontana D; Ruppenthal S; May A; Aktas C; Mehraein Y; Lipp P; Kaestner L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1237-49. PubMed ID: 25066589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog.
Koch FP; Weng D; Krämer S; Biesterfeld S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 20074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of surface modified zirconia implants with commercially available zirconium and titanium implants: a histological study in pigs.
Gredes T; Kubasiewicz-Ross P; Gedrange T; Dominiak M; Kunert-Keil C
Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 25025856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of Zirconia Dental Implant Surfaces on Bone Integration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hafezeqoran A; Koodaryan R
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9246721. PubMed ID: 28299337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gingival fibroblast response to (hybrid) ceramic implant reconstruction surfaces is modulated by biomaterial type and surface treatment.
Rabel K; Blankenburg A; Steinberg T; Kohal RJ; Spies BC; Adolfsson E; Witkowski S; Altmann B
Dent Mater; 2024 Apr; 40(4):689-699. PubMed ID: 38395737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone response to functionally loaded, two-piece zirconia implants: A preclinical histometric study.
Janner SFM; Gahlert M; Bosshardt DD; Roehling S; Milz S; Higginbottom F; Buser D; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):277-289. PubMed ID: 29288505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
