These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [Clinical observation of non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor combined passive leg raising test in predicting the children volume responsiveness]. Wu Y; Liu X; Li C; He Y; Yang W; Yang Y; Ma W; Fu K Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2014 Jan; 26(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 24506855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in healthy term neonates during postnatal circulatory adaptation. He SR; Zhang C; Liu YM; Sun YX; Zhuang J; Chen JM; Madigan VM; Smith BE; Sun X Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Aug; 124(15):2284-9. PubMed ID: 21933558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemodynamic effects of i.v. milrinone lactate in pediatric patients with septic shock. A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, interventional study. Barton P; Garcia J; Kouatli A; Kitchen L; Zorka A; Lindsay C; Lawless S; Giroir B Chest; 1996 May; 109(5):1302-12. PubMed ID: 8625683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods]. Zheng ML; Sun X; Zhong J; He SR; Pan W; Pang CC; Sun YX; Liu YM Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23527933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of haemodynamics and outcome of fluid-refractory septic shock in children. Deep A; Goonasekera CD; Wang Y; Brierley J Intensive Care Med; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1602-9. PubMed ID: 23812341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring of cardiac function in septic shock patients: a prospective study]. Yi M; Yao G; Guo X Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25591432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography. Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac Output Measurement Using the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor: A Validation Study in Newborn Infants. Fraga MV; Dysart KC; Rintoul N; Chaudhary AS; Ratcliffe SJ; Fedec A; Kren S; Cohen MS; Kirpalani H Neonatology; 2019; 116(3):260-268. PubMed ID: 31326967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of continous-wave Doppler ultrasound monitor and echocardiography to assess cardiac output in intensive care patients. Elgendy A; Seppelt IM; Lane AS Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Sep; 19(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28866972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. McNamara H; Barclay P; Sharma V Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 25005720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]