These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28088170)

  • 21. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.
    Gao N; Li J; He J; Xiao G; Luo Y; Zhang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z
    BMC Genet; 2015 Oct; 16():120. PubMed ID: 26466667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A non-parametric mixture model for genome-enabled prediction of genetic value for a quantitative trait.
    Gianola D; Wu XL; Manfredi E; Simianer H
    Genetica; 2010 Oct; 138(9-10):959-77. PubMed ID: 20737196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Including non-additive genetic effects in Bayesian methods for the prediction of genetic values based on genome-wide markers.
    Wittenburg D; Melzer N; Reinsch N
    BMC Genet; 2011 Aug; 12():74. PubMed ID: 21867519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissection of additive, dominance, and imprinting effects for production and reproduction traits in Holstein cattle.
    Jiang J; Shen B; O'Connell JR; VanRaden PM; Cole JB; Ma L
    BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):425. PubMed ID: 28558656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
    Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions.
    Kemper KE; Reich CM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Chamberlain AJ; Mason BA; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):29. PubMed ID: 25887988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic selection and complex trait prediction using a fast EM algorithm applied to genome-wide markers.
    Shepherd RK; Meuwissen TH; Woolliams JA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11():529. PubMed ID: 20969788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):37. PubMed ID: 24912924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.
    Brøndum RF; Su G; Janss L; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Boichard D; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4107-16. PubMed ID: 25892697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multi-population genomic prediction using a multi-task Bayesian learning model.
    Chen L; Li C; Miller S; Schenkel F
    BMC Genet; 2014 May; 15():53. PubMed ID: 24884927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic Prediction from Multiple-Trait Bayesian Regression Methods Using Mixture Priors.
    Cheng H; Kizilkaya K; Zeng J; Garrick D; Fernando R
    Genetics; 2018 May; 209(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 29514861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bayesian composite model space approach for mapping quantitative trait Loci in variance component model.
    Fang M; Liu S; Jiang D
    Behav Genet; 2009 May; 39(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 19263210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.