206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28088592)
1. A systematic review found that deviations from intention-to-treat are common in randomized trials and systematic reviews.
Abraha I; Cozzolino F; Orso M; Marchesi M; Germani A; Lombardo G; Eusebi P; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Iorio A; Montedori A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():37-46. PubMed ID: 28088592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.
Abraha I; Cherubini A; Cozzolino F; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Rimland JM; Folletti I; Marchesi M; Germani A; Orso M; Eusebi P; Montedori A
BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2445. PubMed ID: 26016488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study.
Montedori A; Bonacini MI; Casazza G; Luchetta ML; Duca P; Cozzolino F; Abraha I
Trials; 2011 Feb; 12():58. PubMed ID: 21356072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modified intention-to-treat analysis did not bias trial results.
Dossing A; Tarp S; Furst DE; Gluud C; Wells GA; Beyene J; Hansen BB; Bliddal H; Christensen R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():66-74. PubMed ID: 26562052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives.
Beckett RD; Loeser KC; Bowman KR; Towne TG
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):106. PubMed ID: 27557676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review finds variable use of the intention-to-treat principle in musculoskeletal randomized controlled trials with missing data.
Joseph R; Sim J; Ogollah R; Lewis M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 25304501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intention to treat versus modified intention-to-treat analysis in B-cell maturation antigen and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mohyuddin GR; Atieh T; Ahmed N; Sborov D; McClune B; Abdallah AO; Goodman AM; Aziz M; Allen I; Prasad V
Eur J Cancer; 2021 Oct; 156():164-174. PubMed ID: 34454318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpreting trial results following use of different intention-to-treat approaches for preventing attrition bias: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
Dossing A; Tarp S; Furst DE; Gluud C; Beyene J; Hansen BB; Bliddal H; Christensen R
BMJ Open; 2014 Sep; 4(9):e005297. PubMed ID: 25260368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intention-to-treat analyses in behavioral medicine randomized clinical trials.
Pagoto SL; Kozak AT; John P; Bodenlos JS; Hedeker D; Spring B; Schneider KL
Int J Behav Med; 2009; 16(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 19319693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intention to treat (ITT) analysis as reported in orthodontic randomized controlled trials-evaluations of methodology and recommendations for the accurate use of ITT analysis and handling dropouts.
Bondemark L; Abdulraheem S
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):409-413. PubMed ID: 29069355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting of intention-to-treat analyses in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations.
Gewandter JS; McDermott MP; McKeown A; Smith SM; Pawlowski JR; Poli JJ; Rothstein D; Williams MR; Bujanover S; Farrar JT; Gilron I; Katz NP; Rowbotham MC; Turk DC; Dworkin RH
Pain; 2014 Dec; 155(12):2714-2719. PubMed ID: 25284072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review.
Abraha I; Montedori A
BMJ; 2010 Jun; 340():c2697. PubMed ID: 20547685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of the intention-to-treat principle in nursing clinical trials.
Polit DF; Gillespie BM
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(6):391-9. PubMed ID: 19918150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Per-Protocol analyses produced larger treatment effect sizes than intention to treat: a meta-epidemiological study.
Mostazir M; Taylor G; Henley WE; Watkins ER; Taylor RS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():12-21. PubMed ID: 34161805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods literature.
Alshurafa M; Briel M; Akl EA; Haines T; Moayyedi P; Gentles SJ; Rios L; Tran C; Bhatnagar N; Lamontagne F; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49163. PubMed ID: 23166608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intention-to-treat analysis: Are we managing dropouts and missing data properly in research on orthodontic treatment? A systematic review.
Barretto Dos Santos Lopes Batista K; Thiruvenkatachari B; O'Brien K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):19-27.e3. PubMed ID: 30591159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: are authors saying what they do and doing what they say?
Gravel J; Opatrny L; Shapiro S
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 17848496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing phase III studies in hospice/palliative care. a solution that sits between intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses: the palliative-modified ITT analysis.
Currow DC; Plummer JL; Kutner JS; Samsa GP; Abernethy AP
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Oct; 44(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 22819439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Swedish randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram revisited: analysis of data according to standard versus modified intention-to-treat principle.
Amer-Wåhlin I; Kjellmer I; Maršál K; Olofsson P; Rosén KG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):990-6. PubMed ID: 21623743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intention-to-treat analysis may be more conservative than per protocol analysis in antibiotic non-inferiority trials: a systematic review.
Bai AD; Komorowski AS; Lo CKL; Tandon P; Li XX; Mokashi V; Cvetkovic A; Findlater A; Liang L; Tomlinson G; Loeb M; Mertz D;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 33874894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
