These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28088592)

  • 1. A systematic review found that deviations from intention-to-treat are common in randomized trials and systematic reviews.
    Abraha I; Cozzolino F; Orso M; Marchesi M; Germani A; Lombardo G; Eusebi P; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Iorio A; Montedori A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():37-46. PubMed ID: 28088592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.
    Abraha I; Cherubini A; Cozzolino F; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Rimland JM; Folletti I; Marchesi M; Germani A; Orso M; Eusebi P; Montedori A
    BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2445. PubMed ID: 26016488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study.
    Montedori A; Bonacini MI; Casazza G; Luchetta ML; Duca P; Cozzolino F; Abraha I
    Trials; 2011 Feb; 12():58. PubMed ID: 21356072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified intention-to-treat analysis did not bias trial results.
    Dossing A; Tarp S; Furst DE; Gluud C; Wells GA; Beyene J; Hansen BB; Bliddal H; Christensen R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():66-74. PubMed ID: 26562052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives.
    Beckett RD; Loeser KC; Bowman KR; Towne TG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):106. PubMed ID: 27557676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review finds variable use of the intention-to-treat principle in musculoskeletal randomized controlled trials with missing data.
    Joseph R; Sim J; Ogollah R; Lewis M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 25304501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intention to treat versus modified intention-to-treat analysis in B-cell maturation antigen and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mohyuddin GR; Atieh T; Ahmed N; Sborov D; McClune B; Abdallah AO; Goodman AM; Aziz M; Allen I; Prasad V
    Eur J Cancer; 2021 Oct; 156():164-174. PubMed ID: 34454318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting trial results following use of different intention-to-treat approaches for preventing attrition bias: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Dossing A; Tarp S; Furst DE; Gluud C; Beyene J; Hansen BB; Bliddal H; Christensen R
    BMJ Open; 2014 Sep; 4(9):e005297. PubMed ID: 25260368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intention-to-treat analyses in behavioral medicine randomized clinical trials.
    Pagoto SL; Kozak AT; John P; Bodenlos JS; Hedeker D; Spring B; Schneider KL
    Int J Behav Med; 2009; 16(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 19319693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intention to treat (ITT) analysis as reported in orthodontic randomized controlled trials-evaluations of methodology and recommendations for the accurate use of ITT analysis and handling dropouts.
    Bondemark L; Abdulraheem S
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):409-413. PubMed ID: 29069355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting of intention-to-treat analyses in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations.
    Gewandter JS; McDermott MP; McKeown A; Smith SM; Pawlowski JR; Poli JJ; Rothstein D; Williams MR; Bujanover S; Farrar JT; Gilron I; Katz NP; Rowbotham MC; Turk DC; Dworkin RH
    Pain; 2014 Dec; 155(12):2714-2719. PubMed ID: 25284072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review.
    Abraha I; Montedori A
    BMJ; 2010 Jun; 340():c2697. PubMed ID: 20547685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of the intention-to-treat principle in nursing clinical trials.
    Polit DF; Gillespie BM
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(6):391-9. PubMed ID: 19918150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Per-Protocol analyses produced larger treatment effect sizes than intention to treat: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Mostazir M; Taylor G; Henley WE; Watkins ER; Taylor RS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():12-21. PubMed ID: 34161805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods literature.
    Alshurafa M; Briel M; Akl EA; Haines T; Moayyedi P; Gentles SJ; Rios L; Tran C; Bhatnagar N; Lamontagne F; Walter SD; Guyatt GH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49163. PubMed ID: 23166608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intention-to-treat analysis: Are we managing dropouts and missing data properly in research on orthodontic treatment? A systematic review.
    Barretto Dos Santos Lopes Batista K; Thiruvenkatachari B; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):19-27.e3. PubMed ID: 30591159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: are authors saying what they do and doing what they say?
    Gravel J; Opatrny L; Shapiro S
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 17848496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyzing phase III studies in hospice/palliative care. a solution that sits between intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses: the palliative-modified ITT analysis.
    Currow DC; Plummer JL; Kutner JS; Samsa GP; Abernethy AP
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Oct; 44(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 22819439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Swedish randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram revisited: analysis of data according to standard versus modified intention-to-treat principle.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Kjellmer I; Maršál K; Olofsson P; Rosén KG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):990-6. PubMed ID: 21623743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intention-to-treat analysis may be more conservative than per protocol analysis in antibiotic non-inferiority trials: a systematic review.
    Bai AD; Komorowski AS; Lo CKL; Tandon P; Li XX; Mokashi V; Cvetkovic A; Findlater A; Liang L; Tomlinson G; Loeb M; Mertz D;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 33874894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.