These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28089336)
1. A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations. Bae EJ; Jeong ID; Kim WC; Kim JH J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Aug; 118(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 28089336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of computer-aided design trial restorations fabricated with different digital workflows. Taha D; Allam S; Morsi T J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Sep; 132(3):578-585. PubMed ID: 37925250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of zirconia crown manufactured using stereolithography and digital light processing. Lee HB; Noh MJ; Bae EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104834. PubMed ID: 38217958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Defects of Indirect Inlay Patterns Fabricated Using Additive Manufacturing and Traditional Methods - An Ex Vivo Study. Peddi SS; Taduri V; Shivakumar A Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 31145558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional trueness and margin quality of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition. Li R; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Shen Z; Sun Y J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):478-484. PubMed ID: 32063530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of repeated firings on marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different techniques. Önöral Ö; Ulusoy M; Seker E; Etikan İ J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 29627208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of additively manufactured zirconia four-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by stereolithography, digital light processing and material jetting compared with subtractive manufacturing. Lüchtenborg J; Willems E; Zhang F; Wesemann C; Weiss F; Nold J; Sun J; Sandra F; Bai J; Reveron H; Chevalier J; Spies BC Dent Mater; 2022 Sep; 38(9):1459-1469. PubMed ID: 35798578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of stereolithography and milling in fabricating monolithic zirconia crowns with different finish line designs. Li R; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun Y J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104255. PubMed ID: 33340775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. Kim KB; Kim JH; Kim WC; Kim JH J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1432-6. PubMed ID: 25218032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study. You SG; You SM; Kang SY; Bae SY; Kim JH J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):479-485. PubMed ID: 32276824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study. Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of glazing and aging on the marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using additive and subtractive techniques. Toksoy D; Önöral Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):658.e1-658.e9. PubMed ID: 38342643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems. Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems. Hamza TA; Sherif RM J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An assessment of the passivity of the fit of multiunit screw-retained implant frameworks manufactured by using additive and subtractive technologies. Abu Ghofa A; Önöral Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 34294420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations. Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints. Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of zirconia crowns manufactured by stereolithography with an occlusal full-supporting structure: An in vitro study. Li R; Xu T; Wang Y; Sun Y J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):902-907. PubMed ID: 35183363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison. Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flexural strength of aged and nonaged interim materials fabricated by using milling, additive manufacturing, and a combination of subtractive and additive methods. Giugovaz A; Pérez-Giugovaz MG; Al-Haj Husain N; Barmak AB; Özcan M; Revilla-León M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):513.e1-513.e11. PubMed ID: 35934575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]