These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28089385)

  • 1. Tailored telephone counselling to increase participation of underusers in a population-based colorectal cancer-screening programme with faecal occult blood test: A randomized controlled trial.
    Denis B; Broc G; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Gana K; Perrin P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2017 Feb; 65(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28089385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct mailing of faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized population study from Central Italy.
    Giorgi Rossi P; Grazzini G; Anti M; Baiocchi D; Barca A; Bellardini P; Brezzi S; Camilloni L; Falini P; Maccallini V; Mantellini P; Romeo D; Rubeca T; Venditti MA
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 22045820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised controlled trial of personalised decision support delivered via the internet for bowel cancer screening with a faecal occult blood test: the effects of tailoring of messages according to social cognitive variables on participation.
    Wilson CJ; Flight IH; Turnbull D; Gregory T; Cole SR; Young GP; Zajac IT
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Apr; 15():25. PubMed ID: 25886492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
    Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of a brief phone intervention to increase participation in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme: a randomized controlled trial.
    Selva A; Torà N; Pascual E; Espinàs JA; Baré M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Oct; 21(10):1120-1129. PubMed ID: 31099455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison.
    Klabunde C; Blom J; Bulliard JL; Garcia M; Hagoel L; Mai V; Patnick J; Rozjabek H; Senore C; Törnberg S
    J Med Screen; 2015 Sep; 22(3):119-26. PubMed ID: 25967088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders.
    Tinmouth J; Patel J; Austin PC; Baxter NN; Brouwers MC; Earle C; Levitt C; Lu Y; Mackinnon M; Paszat L; Rabeneck L
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 136(6):E697-703. PubMed ID: 25195923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies for delivery of faecal occult blood test kits and participation to colorectal cancer screening in the Emilia-Romagna Region of Italy.
    Mancini S; Ravaioli A; Falcini F; Giuliani O; Corradini R; De Girolamo G; Goldoni CA; Finarelli AC; Naldoni C; Landi P; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Bucchi L
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Jan; 27(1):. PubMed ID: 28032381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of colorectal neoplasia screening tests: a multicentre community-based study of the impact of consumer choice.
    Multicentre Australian Colorectal-neoplasia Screening (MACS) Group
    Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(11):546-50. PubMed ID: 16768659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized trial of direct mailing of fecal occult blood tests to increase colorectal cancer screening.
    Church TR; Yeazel MW; Jones RM; Kochevar LK; Watt GD; Mongin SJ; Cordes JE; Engelhard D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 May; 96(10):770-80. PubMed ID: 15150305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening with faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for colorectal cancer: assessment of two methods that attempt to improve compliance.
    Ore L; Hagoel L; Lavi I; Rennert G
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2001 Jun; 10(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11432712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using physician-linked mailed invitations in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: effectiveness and factors associated with response.
    Tinmouth J; Baxter NN; Paszat LF; Rabeneck L; Sutradhar R; Yun L
    BMJ Open; 2014 Mar; 4(3):e004494. PubMed ID: 24622950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a Doctor's Invitation on Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
    Barthe J; Perrodeau E; Gilberg S; Ravaud P; Ghasarossian C; Marchand-Buttin F; Deyra J; Falcoff H
    Am J Med; 2015 Sep; 128(9):1024.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25908395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of different strategies used to invite subjects with a positive faecal occult blood test to a colonoscopy assessment. A randomised controlled trial in population-based screening programmes.
    Zorzi M; Giorgi Rossi P; Cogo C; Falcini F; Giorgi D; Grazzini G; Mariotti L; Matarese V; Soppelsa F; Senore C; Ferro A;
    Prev Med; 2014 Aug; 65():70-6. PubMed ID: 24811759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening programs in Spain.
    Vanaclocha-Espi M; Ibáñez J; Molina-Barceló A; Pérez E; Nolasco A; Font R; Pérez-Riquelme F; de la Vega M; Arana-Arri E; Oceja M; Espinàs JA; Portillo I; Salas D;
    Prev Med; 2017 Dec; 105():190-196. PubMed ID: 28887191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alerts in electronic medical records to promote a colorectal cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.
    Guiriguet C; Muñoz-Ortiz L; Burón A; Rivero I; Grau J; Vela-Vallespín C; Vilarrubí M; Torres M; Hernández C; Méndez-Boo L; Toràn P; Caballeria L; Macià F; Castells A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Jul; 66(648):e483-90. PubMed ID: 27266861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of area-level deprivation and gender in participation in population-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening.
    Clarke N; McNamara D; Kearney PM; O'Morain CA; Shearer N; Sharp L
    Prev Med; 2016 Dec; 93():198-203. PubMed ID: 27765660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Participation in faecal immunochemical testing-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in the northwest of Europe.
    Toes-Zoutendijk E; Portillo I; Hoeck S; de Brabander I; Perrin P; Dubois C; van Leerdam M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bardou M
    J Med Screen; 2020 Jun; 27(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 31645173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Organized colorectal cancer screening].
    Rouëssé J; Sancho-Garnier H;
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2014 Feb; 198(2):387-99. PubMed ID: 26263711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
    van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.