116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2808953)
1. Information transfer in dentistry: opportunities and concerns. Trouble right here in River City: can we ignore it?
Levy BM
J Am Coll Dent; 1989; 56(3):28-32. PubMed ID: 2808953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Information transfer to the profession: opportunities and concerns.
Simonsen RJ
J Am Coll Dent; 1989; 56(3):25-7. PubMed ID: 2808952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
Manschot WA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):98. PubMed ID: 7838231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Information transfer in dentistry: opportunities and concerns. The role of the professional journal.
Wathen WF
J Am Coll Dent; 1989; 56(3):23-4. PubMed ID: 2808951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Maintaining ethical standards in medical publishing.
Youngs R; Kenyon G
J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Jan; 120(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16375774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside.
Fisher RS; Powers LE
Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 15270753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reflections on scientific fraud.
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6906):417. PubMed ID: 12368816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. More questions about research misconduct.
Kennedy D
Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5578):13. PubMed ID: 12098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reactions to the Hwang scandal.
Martin TJ
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):606-7. PubMed ID: 16459361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publishing].
Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Sep; 138(36):1822-6. PubMed ID: 7935910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peers under pressure.
Dalton R
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bad peer reviewers.
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Writing to get published.
Wink DM
Nephrol Nurs J; 2002 Oct; 29(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 12434452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
