These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28089966)
1. Establishment of a Single Temperature Incubation Approach for Environmental Monitoring Samples with Focus on Mold Recoveries. Poloni A; GonÇalves J; Pereira M; Stoll A PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2024 Jun; 78(3):312-330. PubMed ID: 37848200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of portable devices for medicine quality screening: Lessons learnt, recommendations for implementation, and future priorities. Caillet C; Vickers S; Vidhamaly V; Boutsamay K; Boupha P; Zambrzycki S; Luangasanatip N; Lubell Y; Fernández FM; Newton PN PLoS Med; 2021 Sep; 18(9):e1003747. PubMed ID: 34591861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to Evaluate If Microorganisms Isolated From Sterile Drug Production Environments Monitoring Are Undesirable. Ceccanti S; Vecchiani S; Leonangeli G; Burgalassi S; Federigi I; Carducci A; Verani M J Pharm Sci; 2024 Jun; 113(6):1682-1688. PubMed ID: 38325736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different incubation conditions for microbiological environmental monitoring. Gordon O; Berchtold M; Staerk A; Roesti D PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 25336415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examination of the order of incubation for the recovery of bacteria and fungi from pharmaceutical-grade cleanrooms. Sandle T Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 25306772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous and Effective Microbiological Air Monitoring in Critical Environments: A Comparison of Analytical Methodologies. Dalmaso G; Campanella A; Lazzeri P PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(4):446-455. PubMed ID: 32060221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the BioVigilant IMD-A, a novel optical spectroscopy technology for the continuous and real-time environmental monitoring of viable and nonviable particles. Part II. Case studies in environmental monitoring during aseptic filling, intervention assessments, and glove integrity testing in manufacturing isolators. Miller MJ; Walsh MR; Shrake JL; Dukes RE; Hill DB PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 20069799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring. Goverde M; Willrodt J; Staerk A PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017 1/2; 71(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 27516491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision of Viable Environmental Monitoring in a Development Pilot Plant Based on Quality Risk Assessment: A Case Study. Ziegler I; Borbély-Jakab J; Sugó L; Kovács RJ PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017; 71(3):234-244. PubMed ID: 28089966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental and Personnel Monitoring Programs-A Risk-Based Case Study of Tidswel EC; Boone K PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(4):408-422. PubMed ID: 32060223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation Study of Rapid Assays of Bioburden, Endotoxins and Other Contamination. Shintani H Biocontrol Sci; 2016; 21(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 27350424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]