BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28092274)

  • 1. Power Profiles and In Vitro Optical Quality of Scleral Contact Lenses: Effect of the Aperture and Power.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Recchioni A; Brautaset R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 28092274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability of in vitro power profile measurements for multifocal contact lenses.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Marín-Franch I; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Madrid-Costa D; Montés-Micó R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Jun; 38(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 25704460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power profiles in multifocal contact lenses with variable multifocal zone.
    Monsálvez-Romín D; Domínguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Cerviño A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jan; 101(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 28718954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical quality of rotationally symmetrical contact lenses derived from their power profiles.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Monsálvez-Romín D; Papadatou E
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):346-350. PubMed ID: 28522252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optical quality comparison among different Boston contact lens materials.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 26875851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro optical quality of monofocal aspheric toric intraocular lenses: effect of cylindrical power.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Domínguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Diez MA; Alfonso JF; Esteve-Taboada JJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):933-941. PubMed ID: 28444524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of power profiles measured on NIMO TR1504 (Lambda-X) and effects of lens decentration for single vision, bifocal and multifocal contact lenses.
    Kim E; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K
    J Optom; 2016; 9(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 26590009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of contact lens power profile on peripheral refractive error.
    de la Jara PL; Sankaridurg P; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jun; 91(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 24811847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical quality comparison between 2 collagen copolymer posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens designs.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Ferrer-Blasco T; Pérez-Vives C; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1268-78. PubMed ID: 26189382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scleral contact lens thickness profiles: The relationship between average and centre lens thickness.
    Vincent SJ; Alonso-Caneiro D; Kricancic H; Collins MJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Feb; 42(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 29555408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power Profiles of Commercial Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses.
    Kim E; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):183-196. PubMed ID: 27748699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power profiles of single vision and multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Wagner S; Conrad F; Bakaraju RC; Fedtke C; Ehrmann K; Holden BA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 25139719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro power profiles of daily disposable contact lenses.
    Belda-Salmerón L; Madrid-Costa D; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Montés-Micó R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):247-52. PubMed ID: 23639863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical and imaging properties of a novel multi-segment spectacle lens designed to slow myopia progression.
    Jaskulski M; Singh NK; Bradley A; Kollbaum PS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Sep; 40(5):549-556. PubMed ID: 32808381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biconcave contact lenses: a critical analysis of their optical properties.
    Rol P; Fankhauser F; Niederer P
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 1999 Apr; 30(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 10219035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optical power distribution of refractive and aspheric multifocal contact lenses: Effect of pupil size.
    Madrid-Costa D; Ruiz-Alcocer J; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 25899637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power profiles of multifocal contact lenses and their interpretation.
    Plainis S; Atchison DA; Charman WN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 90(10):1066-77. PubMed ID: 23995515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulated optical performance of soft contact lenses on the eye.
    Abass A; Stuart S; Lopes BT; Zhou D; Geraghty B; Wu R; Jones S; Flux I; Stortelder R; Snepvangers A; Leca R; Elsheikh A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216484. PubMed ID: 31086372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multifocal contact lenses: towards customisation?
    Faria-Ribeiro M; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 30628741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Change in over-refraction after scleral lens settling on average corneas.
    Bray C; Britton S; Yeung D; Haines L; Sorbara L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):467-472. PubMed ID: 28497619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.