BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28092274)

  • 21. A preliminary in vivo assessment of higher-order aberrations induced by a silicone hydrogel monofocal contact lens.
    Awwad ST; Sanchez P; Sanchez A; McCulley JP; Cavanagh HD
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jan; 34(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 18180674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing the optical properties of soft contact lenses on and off the eye.
    Kollbaum PS; Bradley A; Thibos LN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Sep; 90(9):924-36. PubMed ID: 23969894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optical performance of decentered bifocal contact lenses.
    Woods RL; Saunders JE; Port MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Mar; 70(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 8483576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of soft contact lenses on the measurements of intraocular pressure with non-contact pneumotonometry.
    Schollmayer P; Hawlina M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Dec; 220(12):840-2. PubMed ID: 14704940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repeatability of
    Ferrer-Blasco T; Domínguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Díez-Ajenjo MA; Alfonso JF; Esteve-Taboada JJ
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(7):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 30046530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Legras R; Rio D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantifying the Optical and Physical Consequences of Daily Cleaning on Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses.
    Wilting SM; Hastings GD; Nguyen LC; Kauffman MJ; Bell ES; Hu C; Rijal S; Marsack JD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Sep; 97(9):754-760. PubMed ID: 32941335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses: a comparative assessment of the in vitro optical performance.
    Young G; Grey CP; Papas EB
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 May; 67(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 2367087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intra-eye visual function comparison with and without a central hole contact lens-based system: potential applications to ICL design.
    Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Belda-Salmerón L; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 29(10):702-7. PubMed ID: 24094310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laboratory Evaluation of the Influence of Decentration and Pupil Size on the Optical Performance of a Monofocal, Bifocal, and Trifocal Intraocular Lens.
    Tandogan T; Son HS; Choi CY; Knorz MC; Auffarth GU; Khoramnia R
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Dec; 33(12):808-812. PubMed ID: 29227508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optical design considerations for contact lens bifocals.
    Erickson P; Robboy M; Apollonio A; Jones WF
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Mar; 59(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 3351186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fourier tools for the evaluation of refractive multifocal designs.
    De Gracia P
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22585. PubMed ID: 38114735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy of spherical aberration correction based on contact lens power.
    Koh S; Maeda N; Hamada T; Nishida K
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Aug; 37(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 24439628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optical characteristics of Alvarez variable-power spectacles.
    Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):284-296. PubMed ID: 28211160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of progressive addition lenses by direct measurement of surface shape.
    Huang CY; Raasch TW; Yi AY; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 90(6):565-75. PubMed ID: 23689676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On-eye optical quality of daily disposable contact lenses for different wearing times.
    Montés-Micó R; Belda-Salmerón L; Ferrer-Blasco T; Albarrán-Diego C; García-Lázaro S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Sep; 33(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 23510388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tolerance and nature of residual refraction in symmetric power space as principal lens powers and meridians change.
    Abelman H; Abelman S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():492383. PubMed ID: 25478004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simultaneous defocus integration during refractive development.
    Tse DY; Lam CS; Guggenheim JA; Lam C; Li KK; Liu Q; To CH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5352-9. PubMed ID: 18055781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony.
    Domínguez-Vicent A; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 254(7):1387-97. PubMed ID: 26671689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aberrations associated with rigid contact lenses.
    Atchison DA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 Oct; 12(10):2267-73. PubMed ID: 7500208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.