133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28093399)
21. [The structure of scientific publications].
Bashchinskiĭ SE
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2010; 89(5):76-81. PubMed ID: 21207895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Replication publication.
Patterson M; Cardon L
PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e327. PubMed ID: 16149852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducibility in ecological research.
Huang X
Science; 2014 Dec; 346(6215):1307. PubMed ID: 25504709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Type I error in headache research.
Houle TT; Turner DP; Penzien DB
Headache; 2013; 53(7):1031-3. PubMed ID: 23773114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. When abstracts conflict with published papers.
DeMaria AN
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1489-90. PubMed ID: 24112818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. What a reviewer wants?
Khetan V; Sengupta S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 65(8):656-657. PubMed ID: 28820149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reflections on the Irreproducibility of Scientific Papers.
Bolli R
Circ Res; 2015 Sep; 117(8):665-6. PubMed ID: 26405183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Independence Day.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A Compilation of Best Papers.
Tepper LB
J Occup Environ Med; 2016 Feb; 58(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 26849253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomedicine is plagued by failure of replication.
Kullmann DM
Brain; 2015 Jun; 138(Pt 6):1443. PubMed ID: 26013802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Standardization of reviews of scientific publications].
Ventura AG
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):574-5; author reply 575. PubMed ID: 19839127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How do we ensure 'high quality' clinical research?
Creinin MD; Shields W
Contraception; 2005 Aug; 72(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 16022844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality of original medical papers.
Locke S
J Sci Med Sport; 2006 May; 9(1-2):190-1. PubMed ID: 16621707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Publishing what's important.
Freedman R
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):417-8. PubMed ID: 26396088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Author conflict and bias in research: quantifying the downgrade in methodology.
Vaccaro AR; Patel AA; Fisher C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):E895-6. PubMed ID: 21642805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Reflections on the truth].
Goldenberg S
Acta Cir Bras; 2007; 22(6):420-1. PubMed ID: 18235927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Peer review should continue after publication.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Journals unite for reproducibility.
Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7525):7. PubMed ID: 25373636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Challenges for a research publication: quantity, quality, and crowd wisdom.
Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 64(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 25104533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
