227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28093433)
1. Is questionnaire-based sitting time inaccurate and can it be improved? A cross-sectional investigation using accelerometer-based sitting time.
Gupta N; Christiansen CS; Hanisch C; Bay H; Burr H; Holtermann A
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e013251. PubMed ID: 28093433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed measures.
Maes I; Ketels M; Van Dyck D; Clays E
BMC Public Health; 2020 Jul; 20(1):1072. PubMed ID: 32631292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of sedentary behaviors and transport-related activities by questionnaire: a validation study.
Mensah K; Maire A; Oppert JM; Dugas J; Charreire H; Weber C; Simon C; Nazare JA;
BMC Public Health; 2016 Aug; 16():753. PubMed ID: 27506456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of two self-report measures of sitting time.
Clemes SA; David BM; Zhao Y; Han X; Brown W
J Phys Act Health; 2012 May; 9(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 21946087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sedentary and physical activity time differs between self-reported ATLS-2 physical activity questionnaire and accelerometer measurements in adolescents and young adults in the United Arab Emirates.
Arumugam A; Mohammad Zadeh SA; Zabin ZA; Hawarneh TME; Ahmed HI; Jauhari FS; Alkalih HY; Shousha TM; Moustafa IM; Häger CK
BMC Public Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):1045. PubMed ID: 37264348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of the Marshall Sitting Questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis.
Sasaki JE; Motl RW; McAuley E
J Sports Sci; 2019 Jun; 37(11):1250-1256. PubMed ID: 30543314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-reported sitting time in New York City adults, the Physical Activity and Transit Survey, 2010-2011.
Yi SS; Bartley KF; Firestone MJ; Lee KK; Eisenhower DL
Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 May; 12():E85. PubMed ID: 26020549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Is the Effect on Obesity Indicators from Replacing Prolonged Sedentary Time with Brief Sedentary Bouts, Standing and Different Types of Physical Activity during Working Days? A Cross-Sectional Accelerometer-Based Study among Blue-Collar Workers.
Gupta N; Heiden M; Aadahl M; Korshøj M; Jørgensen MB; Holtermann A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154935. PubMed ID: 27187777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of self-reported measures of workplace sitting time and breaks in sitting time.
Clark BK; Thorp AA; Winkler EA; Gardiner PA; Healy GN; Owen N; Dunstan DW
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Oct; 43(10):1907-12. PubMed ID: 21926535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the bias of self-reported sitting time be corrected? A statistical model validation study based on data from 23 993 adults in the Norwegian HUNT study.
Kongsvold A; Flaaten M; Logacjov A; Skarpsno ES; Bach K; Nilsen TIL; Mork PJ
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2023 Nov; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 38012746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of long-term and short-term recall of occupational sitting time in Finnish and Chinese office workers.
Gao Y; Cronin NJ; Nevala N; Finni T
J Sport Health Sci; 2020 Jul; 9(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 32768127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ) to office based workers.
Jancey J; Tye M; McGann S; Blackford K; Lee AH
BMC Public Health; 2014 Jul; 14():762. PubMed ID: 25069528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal patterns of sitting at work are associated with neck-shoulder pain in blue-collar workers: a cross-sectional analysis of accelerometer data in the DPHACTO study.
Hallman DM; Mathiassen SE; Heiden M; Gupta N; Jørgensen MB; Holtermann A
Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2016 Jul; 89(5):823-33. PubMed ID: 26935311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A tool for measuring workers' sitting time by domain: the Workforce Sitting Questionnaire.
Chau JY; van der Ploeg HP; Dunn S; Kurko J; Bauman AE
Br J Sports Med; 2011 Dec; 45(15):1216-22. PubMed ID: 21947817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The CNN Hip Accelerometer Posture (CHAP) Method for Classifying Sitting Patterns from Hip Accelerometers: A Validation Study.
Greenwood-Hickman MA; Nakandala S; Jankowska MM; Rosenberg DE; Tuz-Zahra F; Bellettiere J; Carlson J; Hibbing PR; Zou J; Lacroix AZ; Kumar A; Natarajan L
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2021 Nov; 53(11):2445-2454. PubMed ID: 34033622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calibration of the global physical activity questionnaire to Accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary behavior.
Metcalf KM; Baquero BI; Coronado Garcia ML; Francis SL; Janz KF; Laroche HH; Sewell DK
BMC Public Health; 2018 Mar; 18(1):412. PubMed ID: 29587694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity in Canadian adults.
Colley RC; Butler G; Garriguet D; Prince SA; Roberts KC
Health Rep; 2018 Dec; 29(12):3-15. PubMed ID: 30566204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of sitting time scores from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form in multiple sclerosis.
Motl RW; Sasaki JE; Cederberg KL; Jeng B
Rehabil Psychol; 2019 Nov; 64(4):463-468. PubMed ID: 31107044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population.
Chu AHY; Ng SHX; Koh D; Müller-Riemenschneider F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29649161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is self-reported time spent sedentary and in physical activity differentially biased by age, gender, body mass index, and low-back pain?
Gupta N; Heiden M; Mathiassen SE; Holtermann A
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Mar; 44(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 29184965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
