These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28094035)

  • 1. Extinction Generates Outcome-Specific Conditioned Inhibition.
    Laurent V; Chieng B; Balleine BW
    Curr Biol; 2016 Dec; 26(23):3169-3175. PubMed ID: 28094035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extinction and Latent Inhibition Involve a Similar Form of Inhibitory Learning that is Stored in and Retrieved from the Infralimbic Cortex.
    Lingawi NW; Westbrook RF; Laurent V
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5547-5556. PubMed ID: 27797830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lesions of rat infralimbic cortex result in disrupted retardation but normal summation test performance following training on a Pavlovian conditioned inhibition procedure.
    Rhodes SE; Killcross AS
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 26(9):2654-60. PubMed ID: 17970744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extinguishing cue-controlled reward choice: Effects of Pavlovian extinction on outcome-selective Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.
    Seabrooke T; Le Pelley ME; Porter A; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):280-292. PubMed ID: 29985045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. All we need is a cue to remember: the effect of an extinction cue on renewal.
    Dibbets P; Havermans R; Arntz A
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Sep; 46(9):1070-7. PubMed ID: 18675398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experiencing extinction with a non-target cue facilitates reversal of a target conditioned inhibitor in human predictive learning.
    González G; Alcalá JA; Callejas-Aguilera JE; Rosas JM
    Behav Processes; 2019 Sep; 166():103898. PubMed ID: 31265879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protection from extinction provided by a conditioned inhibitor.
    McConnell BL; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2010 Feb; 38(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 20065350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backward conditioning: mediation by the context.
    Chang RC; Blaisdell AP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jul; 29(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 12884677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associative status of the training context determines the effectiveness of compound extinction.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 22229586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recovery from blocking between outcomes.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of different subregions of the basolateral amygdala in cue-induced reinstatement and extinction of food-seeking behavior.
    McLaughlin RJ; Floresco SB
    Neuroscience; 2007 Jun; 146(4):1484-94. PubMed ID: 17449185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intact renewal after extinction of conditioned suppression with lesions of either the retrosplenial cortex or dorsal hippocampus.
    Todd TP; Jiang MY; DeAngeli NE; Bucci DJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 320():143-153. PubMed ID: 27884768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ventral hippocampus, but not the dorsal hippocampus is critical for learned approach-avoidance decision making.
    Schumacher A; Vlassov E; Ito R
    Hippocampus; 2016 Apr; 26(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 26493973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proactive interference by cues presented without outcomes: Differences in context specificity of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition.
    Miguez G; McConnell B; Polack CW; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2018 Sep; 46(3):265-280. PubMed ID: 29313238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lesions of rat infralimbic cortex enhance recovery and reinstatement of an appetitive Pavlovian response.
    Rhodes SE; Killcross S
    Learn Mem; 2004; 11(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 15466316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-emergence of extinguished auditory-cued conditioned fear following a sub-conditioning procedure: effects of hippocampal and prefrontal tetanic stimulations.
    Deschaux O; Motanis H; Spennato G; Moreau JL; Garcia R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2011 May; 95(4):510-8. PubMed ID: 21397708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition and mediated activation between conditioned stimuli: Parallels between perceptual learning and associative conditioning.
    Polack CW; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29683697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occasion setting, inhibition, and the contextual control of extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental (operant) learning.
    Trask S; Thrailkill EA; Bouton ME
    Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():64-72. PubMed ID: 27720958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the context specificity of extinction and latent inhibition.
    Miller RR; Laborda MA; Polack CW; Miguez G
    Learn Behav; 2015 Dec; 43(4):384-95. PubMed ID: 26100525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other.
    Urushihara K; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):253-70. PubMed ID: 16834493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.