333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28094094)
21. Adopting Braden Q in the NICU to Identify Neonates at Risk of Developing Pressure Injuries.
Wacek M; Ecklund M
Neonatal Netw; 2018 Sep; 37(5):319-323. PubMed ID: 30567814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The development of the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scale.
Willock J; Baharestani MM; Anthony D
J Wound Care; 2009 Jan; 18(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19131913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Prevention of decubitus ulcers in children].
Roques C
Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2009 Aug; (249):36-40. PubMed ID: 19689057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Skin integrity in hospitalized infants and children: a prevalence survey.
Noonan C; Quigley S; Curley MA
J Pediatr Nurs; 2006 Dec; 21(6):445-53. PubMed ID: 17101403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The prognostic ability of early Braden Q Scores in critically ill children.
Tume LN; Siner S; Scott E; Lane S
Nurs Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 24529107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients.
Sardo P; Simões C; Alvarelhão J; Costa C; Simões CJ; Figueira J; Simões JL; Amado F; Amaro A; Melo E
J Clin Nurs; 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3165-76. PubMed ID: 26316350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictive efficacy of the Braden Q Scale for pediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment in the PICU: a meta-analysis.
Chun X; Lin Y; Ma J; He J; Ye L; Yang H
Pediatr Res; 2019 Oct; 86(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 31216569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Comparison of the Braden Q and the Braden QD Scale to Assess Pediatric Risk for Pressure Injuries During Noninvasive Ventilation.
Lauderbaugh DL; Billman G; Popien TL; Hauseur S; Lee E; O'Haver J
Respir Care; 2021 Aug; 66(8):1234-1239. PubMed ID: 33975900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Midrange Braden Subscale Scores Are Associated With Increased Risk for Pressure Injury Development Among Critical Care Patients.
Alderden J; Cummins MR; Pepper GA; Whitney JD; Zhang Y; Butcher R; Thomas D
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):420-428. PubMed ID: 28671894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predicting Pressure Injury Risk in Pediatric Patients: The Braden QD Scale.
Curley MAQ; Hasbani NR; Quigley SM; Stellar JJ; Pasek TA; Shelley SS; Kulik LA; Chamblee TB; Dilloway MA; Caillouette CN; McCabe MA; Wypij D
J Pediatr; 2018 Jan; 192():189-195.e2. PubMed ID: 29246340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation and clinical impact of paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: A systematic review.
Kottner J; Hauss A; Schlüer AB; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Jun; 50(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 21645897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
Fulbrook P; Anderson A
J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability and precision of Braden Scale pressure ulcer risk assessments.
Magnan MA; Maklebust J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(2):199-208; discussion 209-12. PubMed ID: 18344795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale.
García-Molina P; Balaguer López E; Verdú J; Nolasco A; García Fernández FP
J Nurs Manag; 2018 Sep; 26(6):744-756. PubMed ID: 29656490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Mixed-methods Study to Assess Interrater Reliability and Nurse Perception of the Braden Scale in a Tertiary Acute Care Setting.
Ho CH; Cheung A; Southern D; Ocampo W; Kaufman J; Hogan DB; Baylis B; Conly JM; Stelfox HT; Ghali WA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Dec; 62(12):30-38. PubMed ID: 28054924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale and nurse perception in identifying pressure ulcer risk.
VandenBosch T; Montoye C; Satwicz M; Durkee-Leonard K; Boylan-Lewis B
Appl Nurs Res; 1996 May; 9(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 8871435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Braden Q+P: a pediatric perioperative pressure ulcer risk assessment and intervention tool.
Galvin PA; Curley MA
AORN J; 2012 Sep; 96(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 22935255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of a protocol for prevention of facility-acquired heel pressure ulcers.
Walsh JS; Plonczynski DJ
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 17413835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interrater agreement, reliability and validity of the Glamorgan Paediatric Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale.
Kottner J; Kenzler M; Wilborn D
J Clin Nurs; 2014 Apr; 23(7-8):1165-9. PubMed ID: 23121342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
